Ex attivista di Geenpeace denuncia: Greenpeace abbandona il monitoraggio dell’aria e tace sulle scie chimiche

Pochi gior­ni fa si è svol­ta ad Ambur­go una mani­fes­ta­zio­ne di citta­di­ni ade­ren­ti all’associazione »Sau­be­rer Him­mel« (cie­lo più puli­to) che chie­de­va­no a Green­peace di agi­re den­un­ci­an­do a sua vol­ta le scie chi­mi­che, la guer­ra ambi­en­ta­le, la con­ta­mi­na­zio­ne da ura­nio impo­ve­ri­to.

Nel­la foto pote­te vede­re gli atti­vis­ti con uno stri­scio­ne di 16 metri qua­dra­ti recan­te la scrit­ta: »Per­ché Green­peace non fa nul­la con­tro le muni­zio­ni e bom­be all’uranio, HAARP e scie chi­mi­che? — Un invi­to ad agi­re«,

L’ex-attivista di Green­peace Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel insie­me ai mem­bri di »Sau­be­rer Him­mel “ (il cui sito uffi­cia­le è www.sauber-himmel.de) han­no mani­fes­ta­to davan­ti alla sede gene­ra­le di Green­peace ad Ambur­go richie­den­do a Green­peace una pre­sa di posi­zio­ne atti­va su ques­te tema­ti­che.

Scie chi­mi­che copro­no il cie­lo nei din­tor­ni di Abur­go

Lo slo­gan di una vol­ta di Green­peace »Fare non aspet­t­a­re« sem­bra esser­si tras­for­ma­to ormai in “Aspet­t­a­re e non fare”. Green­peace si ripie­ga in una posi­zio­ne pas­si­va, affi­dan­do­si cie­ca­men­te alle isti­tu­zio­ni pubbli­che e pri­va­te e non fa più ricer­che in pro­prio su ques­te tema­ti­che.

Così, ad esem­pio, è sta­to ven­du­to il »Luft­mess­bus« (auto­bus di misura­zio­ne dell’ aria). Per­ché? Improv­vi­samen­te non ci sono più inqui­nan­ti atmos­fe­ri­ci? O si vuo­le evi­t­a­re l’imbarazzo che deri­ve­r­eb­be dal rile­va­re nell’aria sost­an­ze non deri­v­an­ti né dal­lo sca­ri­co dei moto­ri, né dal­le indus­trie, né dai com­bus­ti­bi­li uti­liz­za­ti per il ris­cal­da­men­to?

L’azione chie­de ricer­che indi­pen­den­ti.

www.chemtrail.de

Presseerklärung vom 7.10.2011-Besorgte Bürger fordern Greenpeace zum Handeln auf

Mit einem 16 Qua­drat­me­ter gro­ßen Ban­ner mit der Auf­schrift “War­um macht Green­peace nichts gegen Uran-Muni­ti­on + Bom­ben, HAARP + Chem­trails?- A Call For Action“ und wei­te­ren pla­ka­ti­ven Aus­sa­gen pro­tes­tier­te heu­te der lang­jäh­ri­ge ehe­ma­li­ge Green­peace-Akti­vist Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel mit besorg­ten Bür­gern der Bür­ger­initia­ti­ve „Sau­be­rer Him­mel“ (www.sauberer-himmel.de) vor der Green­peace-Zen­tra­le in Ham­burg und for­dert Green­peace zum Han­deln auf.

Wei­ter­le­sen

Press release from 7.10.2011- Concerned citizens demand action from Greenpeace

Press release from 7.10.2011
Con­cer­ned citi­zens demand action from Green­peace

With a 16 squa­re-met­re ban­ner with the inscrip­ti­on “Why does Green­peace do not­hing about ura­ni­um muni­ti­ons and bombs, HAARP, chem­trails? – A Call for Action” (see pho­to­graph) and pla­cards with other slo­gans, the long-term chem­trails activist Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel, tog­e­ther with con­cer­ned fel­low activists from the citi­zens’ initia­ti­ve “Sau­be­rer Him­mel” (clean sky) (www.sauberer-himmel.de), demons­tra­ted in front of Greenpeace’s head­quar­ters in Ham­burg, deman­ding action from Green­peace.

Greenpeace’s ear­lier slo­gan in Ger­man “Taten statt War­ten” (action ins­tead of wai­ting) seems in the case of the­se sub­jec­ts to have muta­ted into “wai­ting ins­tead of action”. Green­peace has with­drawn to pas­si­ve posi­ti­ons, trus­ting blind­ly in sta­te and pri­va­te insti­tu­ti­ons and doing no rela­ted rese­arch its­elf. The “air mea­su­rement bus” has been sold, for examp­le. Why? Is air pol­lu­ti­on a thing of the past? Or is the pro­blem that one might be embarr­as­sed to find some­thing in the air other than, say, die­sel exhaust?

Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel also argues that the “Peace” in Greenpeace’s tit­le years ago lost its jus­ti­fi­ca­ti­on and should be remo­ved from the name, as Green­peace for a long time has taken no action against the wars star­ted by NATO, e.g. in Afgha­ni­stan, Iraq and now Libya. Hund­reds of thousands of civi­li­an vic­tims and huge are­as of rui­ned land seem to play no role any more for Green­peace. From Green­peace, the action group working with Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel demands inde­pen­dent rese­arch and taboo-free invol­ve­ment on the fol­lo­wing sub­jec­ts:

Ura­ni­um muni­ti­ons

It is total­ly incom­pre­hen­si­ble that Green­peace should have remai­ned silent about the long-term geno­ci­dal app­li­ca­ti­on of (so far) more than 2,500 tons of ura­ni­um muni­ti­ons) appro­xi­mate­ly one mil­li­ons pro­jec­tiles by US and NATO tro­ops. The micro­scopic ura­ni­um nano­dust leads to a mul­ti­tu­de of other ill­nes­ses from lung can­cer to birth defec­ts in the child­ren of the popu­la­ti­ons under attack, as it con­ti­nues to radia­te for hund­reds of thousands of years. (See the film: “Dead­ly Dust” by Frie­der Wag­ner). Accord­ing to a Bri­tish stu­dy, says the Sunday Times of 19.2.2006, a pro­por­ti­on of this ura­ni­um dust is spread far and wide by storms, even­tual­ly reaching Gre­at Bri­tain. But Green­peace is ter­mi­na­ting its “Atom-free Seas” cam­pai­gn. Cri­tique of the mili­ta­ry seems to have beco­me abso­lute­ly taboo for Green­peace.

HAARP

Ano­t­her taboo sub­ject for Green­peace are elec­tro­ma­gne­tic wea­pons sys­tems such as, for examp­le, the US HAARP trans­mit­ting faci­li­ties in Gako­na (Alas­ka) on which the EU Par­li­a­ment as ear­ly as 1999 pro­po­sed a ban, unfor­tu­n­a­te­ly to no effect. The EU docu­ment calls HAARP “a wea­pons sys­tem which dis­rupts the cli­ma­te”, for examp­le by mani­pu­la­ting glo­bal wea­ther pat­terns. It cha­rac­te­ri­zes as unac­cep­ta­ble “mani­pu­la­ti­on of glo­bal wea­ther pat­terns and pun­ching of holes in the iono­s­phe­re, in vio­la­ti­on of the Arc­tic Trea­ty”. The European Par­li­a­ment also cri­ti­ci­zed the “deve­lop­ment of wea­pons for the mani­pu­la­ti­on of the human brain”, cal­ling for them to be ban­ned. As ear­ly as 1994 the Inter­na­tio­nal Red Cross was warning of the poten­ti­al dan­ger to human health of the HAARP faci­li­ty and of its capa­ci­ty to influ­ence human men­tal func­tio­n­ing.

In April 1997 the then US Defen­se Secreta­ry Wil­liam Cohen in a speech at an anti-ter­ro­rism con­fe­rence in Geor­gia said, among other things: “others are enga­ging even in an eco-type of ter­ro­rism wher­e­by they can alter the cli­ma­te, set off ear­th­quakes, vol­ca­noes remo­te­ly through the use of elec­tro­ma­gne­tic waves.”

The cele­bra­ted alter­na­ti­ve Nobel-Pri­ze-win­ning sci­en­tist Dr. Rosa­lie Ber­tell in her book “Pla­net Earth – The Latest Wea­pon of War” named all the geo­phy­si­cal wea­pons sys­tems and the tests that had at that time taken place. She said: “Elec­tro­ma­gne­tic wea­pons have the capa­ci­ty to indu­ce effec­ts such as ear­th­quakes over inter­con­ti­nen­tal distan­ces at tar­gets of their choice any­whe­re on earth, with a power equal to that of lar­ge ato­mic explo­si­ons.” She con­fir­med that US mili­ta­ry sci­en­tists are working on wea­ther sys­tems as a poten­ti­al wea­pon. “The methods inclu­de the inten­si­fi­ca­ti­on of storms and the diver­si­on of vapour streams in the earth’s atmo­s­phe­re in order to pro­du­ce tar­ge­ted droughts or floods.” She takes a posi­ti­on vehe­ment­ly against the con­duc­ting of envi­ron­men­tal war­fa­re, expli­citly iden­ti­fy­ing pro­duc­tion of ear­th­quakes as a wea­pon of war in prac­ti­cal app­li­ca­ti­on.

In 2005 the India Dai­ly wro­te that several other sta­tes pos­sess simi­lar instal­la­ti­ons for tec­to­nic and wea­ther war­fa­re and more and more sta­tes are under­ta­king detec­tion of the mani­pu­la­ti­ons and devi­sing coun­ter-mea­su­res.

Chem­trails / Geo-Engi­nee­ring

The scat­te­ring of poly­mers and metal­lic or sulp­ha­te par­ti­cles from pla­nes over wide are­as of the earth’s sur­face is also play­ing an important role in glo­bal wea­ther mani­pu­la­ti­on, which is offi­ci­al­ly descri­bed as “geo­en­gi­nee­ring”. The Inter­go­vernmen­tal Panel on Cli­ma­te Chan­ge, the planet’s “wea­ther coun­cil” as ear­ly as 2001 favou­red the dis­tri­bu­ti­on of metal­lic par­ti­cles to reflect back into space the rays of the sun; albeit with the side-effect of pro­du­cing a “white sky” (IPCC 2001-S.333–334).

Defen­ding the atmo­s­phe­re in the US Con­gress in 2001, several-times would-be pre­si­den­ti­al can­di­da­te for the US Demo­crats Den­nis Kuci­nich cited the Space Pre­ser­va­ti­on Act, men­tio­ning chem­trails, tec­to­nic wea­pons sys­tems and mind con­trol.

On 12.01.2011 the for­mer head of the FBI in Los Ange­les Ted Gun­der­son took a posi­ti­on on chem­trails, say­ing among other things: “The death dumps, other­wi­se known as che­mi­cal trails, are being drop­ped and spray­ed throughout the United Sta­tes and Eng­land, Scot­land, Ire­land, and Nort­hern Euro­pe. I have per­so­nal­ly seen them not only in the United Sta­tes, but in Mexi­co and in Cana­da. Birds are dying around the world. Fish are dying by the hund­reds of thousands around the world. This is geno­ci­de. This is poi­son. This is mur­der by the United Nati­ons. This ele­ment wit­hin our socie­ty that is doing this must be stop­ped. I hap­pen to know of two of the loca­ti­ons whe­re the air­planes are that dump this crap on us.

Four of the pla­nes are out of the Air Natio­nal Guard in Lin­coln, Nebras­ka. And, the other pla­nes are out of Fort Sill, Okla­ho­ma. I per­so­nal­ly have obser­ved the pla­nes that were stan­ding still in Nebras­ka – Lin­coln, Nebras­ka – at the Air Natio­nal Guard. They have no mar­kings on them. They are huge, bom­ber-like air­planes with no mar­kings. This is a crime: a crime against huma­ni­ty, a crime against Ame­ri­ca, a crime against the citi­zens of this gre­at coun­try. The must be stop­ped. WHAT IS WRONG WITH CONGRESS? This has an effect on their popu­la­ti­on, and their peop­le, and their fri­ends, and their rela­ti­ves, and them­sel­ves. What’s wrong with them? What’s wrong with the pilots who are fly­ing the­se air­planes and dum­ping this crap, this poi­son, on their own fami­lies? Some­bo­dy has to do some­thing about it. Some­bo­dy in Con­gress has to step for­ward and stop it now. Thank you. I’m Ted Gun­der­son.”

The above­men­tio­ned alter­na­ti­ve Nobel Pri­ze win­ner Dr. Rosa­lie Ber­tell on 3rd May 2005 said: “I think that chem­trails are also a vehi­cle for other forms of bio­lo­gi­cal and che­mi­cal war­fa­re.”

Green­peace wants to know not­hing about all this:
When Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel pre­sen­ted the sub­jec­ts of “chem­trails” and “HAARP” to Green­peace, sub­mit­ting nume­rous docu­ments for fur­ther rese­arch, he was told in 2005 that “the­se mat­ters are not com­pa­ti­ble with the objec­tives of Green­peace.”

It is bey­ond com­pre­hen­si­on that a world-wide envi­ron­men­tal orga­ni­za­ti­on such as Green­peace should remain silent about all the­se sub­jec­ts, which rep­re­sent a mas­si­ve thre­at not only to human beings but to the planet’s living envi­ron­ment in toto.

Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel has reams of mate­ri­al in his pos­ses­si­on on the­se sub­jec­ts, and could pro­vi­de even more.

Action- fotos + vide­os on www.chemtrail.de

Olden­burg, 07.10.2011
Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel
Wilh. Kempinstr.55
26133 Olden­burg
T: 0441–46703
werner.altnickel@yahoo.de
www.chemtrail.de