Ex attivista di Geenpeace denuncia: Greenpeace abbandona il monitoraggio dell’aria e tace sulle scie chimiche

Pochi giorni fa si è svolta ad Amburgo una mani­fes­ta­zione di cit­ta­dini ade­renti all’associazione »Sau­be­rer Him­mel« (cielo più pulito) che chie­de­vano a Green­peace di agire denun­ci­ando a sua volta le scie chi­mi­che, la guerra ambi­en­tale, la con­ta­mi­na­zione da ura­nio impoverito.

Nella foto potete vedere gli atti­visti con uno stri­scione di 16 metri qua­drati recante la scritta: »Per­ché Green­peace non fa nulla con­tro le muni­zioni e bombe all’uranio, HAARP e scie chi­mi­che? — Un invito ad agire«,

L’ex-attivista di Green­peace Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel insieme ai mem­bri di »Sau­be­rer Him­mel “ (il cui sito uffi­ciale è www.sauber-himmel.de) hanno mani­fes­tato davanti alla sede gene­rale di Green­peace ad Amburgo richie­dendo a Green­peace una presa di posi­zione attiva su queste tematiche.

Scie chi­mi­che coprono il cielo nei din­torni di Aburgo

Lo slo­gan di una volta di Green­peace »Fare non aspettare« sem­bra essersi tras­for­mato ormai in “Aspettare e non fare”. Green­peace si ripiega in una posi­zione pas­siva, affidan­dosi cie­ca­mente alle isti­tu­zioni pubb­li­che e pri­vate e non fa più ricer­che in pro­prio su queste tematiche.

Così, ad esem­pio, è stato ven­duto il »Luft­mess­bus« (auto­bus di misu­ra­zione dell’ aria). Per­ché? Improv­vi­sa­mente non ci sono più inqui­nanti atmos­fe­rici? O si vuole evi­tare l’imbarazzo che deri­ver­ebbe dal rile­vare nell’aria sostanze non deri­vanti né dallo sca­rico dei motori, né dalle indus­trie, né dai com­bus­ti­bili uti­liz­zati per il riscaldamento?

L’azione chiede ricer­che indipendenti.


Presseerklärung vom 7.10.2011-Besorgte Bürger fordern Greenpeace zum Handeln auf

Mit einem 16 Qua­drat­me­ter gro­ßen Ban­ner mit der Auf­schrift “Warum macht Green­peace nichts gegen Uran-Munition + Bom­ben, HAARP + Chem­trails?- A Call For Action“ und wei­te­ren pla­ka­ti­ven Aus­sa­gen pro­tes­tierte heute der lang­jäh­rige ehe­ma­lige Greenpeace-Aktivist Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel mit besorg­ten Bür­gern der Bür­ger­in­itia­tive „Sau­be­rer Him­mel“ (www.sauberer-himmel.de) vor der Greenpeace-Zentrale in Ham­burg und for­dert Green­peace zum Han­deln auf.


Press release from 7.10.2011– Concerned citizens demand action from Greenpeace

Press release from 7.10.2011
Con­cer­ned citi­zens demand action from Greenpeace

With a 16 square-metre ban­ner with the inscrip­tion “Why does Green­peace do not­hing about ura­nium muni­ti­ons and bombs, HAARP, chem­trails? – A Call for Action” (see pho­to­graph) and pla­cards with other slo­gans, the long-term chem­trails activist Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel, toge­ther with con­cer­ned fel­low activists from the citi­zens’ initia­tive “Sau­be­rer Him­mel” (clean sky) (www.sauberer-himmel.de), demons­tra­ted in front of Greenpeace’s head­quar­ters in Ham­burg, deman­ding action from Greenpeace.

Greenpeace’s ear­lier slo­gan in Ger­man “Taten statt War­ten” (action instead of wait­ing) seems in the case of these sub­jects to have muta­ted into “wait­ing instead of action”. Green­peace has with­drawn to pas­sive posi­ti­ons, trus­ting blindly in state and pri­vate insti­tu­ti­ons and doing no rela­ted rese­arch its­elf. The “air mea­su­re­ment bus” has been sold, for example. Why? Is air pollu­tion a thing of the past? Or is the pro­blem that one might be embar­ras­sed to find some­thing in the air other than, say, die­sel exhaust?

Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel also argues that the “Peace” in Greenpeace’s title years ago lost its justi­fi­ca­tion and should be remo­ved from the name, as Green­peace for a long time has taken no action against the wars star­ted by NATO, e.g. in Afgha­nis­tan, Iraq and now Libya. Hund­reds of thousands of civi­lian vic­tims and huge areas of ruined land seem to play no role any more for Green­peace. From Green­peace, the action group working with Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel demands inde­pen­dent rese­arch and taboo-free invol­ve­ment on the fol­lo­wing subjects:

Ura­nium munitions

It is totally incom­pre­hen­si­ble that Green­peace should have remai­ned silent about the long-term geno­ci­dal app­li­ca­tion of (so far) more than 2,500 tons of ura­nium muni­ti­ons) appro­xi­mately one mil­li­ons pro­jec­tiles by US and NATO tro­ops. The micro­sco­pic ura­nium nano­dust leads to a mul­ti­tude of other ill­nes­ses from lung can­cer to birth defects in the child­ren of the popu­la­ti­ons under attack, as it con­ti­nues to radiate for hund­reds of thousands of years. (See the film: “Deadly Dust” by Frie­der Wag­ner). Accor­ding to a Bri­tish study, says the Sun­day Times of 19.2.2006, a pro­por­tion of this ura­nium dust is spread far and wide by storms, even­tually reaching Great Bri­tain. But Green­peace is ter­mi­na­ting its “Atom-free Seas” cam­paign. Cri­ti­que of the mili­tary seems to have become abso­lu­tely taboo for Greenpeace.


Ano­ther taboo sub­ject for Green­peace are elec­tro­ma­gne­tic wea­pons sys­tems such as, for example, the US HAARP trans­mit­ting faci­li­ties in Gakona (Alaska) on which the EU Par­lia­ment as early as 1999 pro­po­sed a ban, unfor­t­u­na­tely to no effect. The EU docu­ment calls HAARP “a wea­pons sys­tem which dis­rupts the cli­mate”, for example by mani­pu­la­ting glo­bal wea­t­her pat­terns. It cha­rac­te­ri­zes as unac­cep­ta­ble “mani­pu­la­tion of glo­bal wea­t­her pat­terns and pun­ching of holes in the iono­s­phere, in vio­la­tion of the Arc­tic Treaty”. The Euro­pean Par­lia­ment also cri­ti­ci­zed the “deve­lop­ment of wea­pons for the mani­pu­la­tion of the human brain”, cal­ling for them to be ban­ned. As early as 1994 the Inter­na­tio­nal Red Cross was warning of the poten­tial dan­ger to human health of the HAARP faci­lity and of its capa­city to influ­ence human men­tal functioning.

In April 1997 the then US Defense Secretary Wil­liam Cohen in a speech at an anti-terrorism con­fe­rence in Geor­gia said, among other things: “others are enga­ging even in an eco-type of ter­ro­rism whe­reby they can alter the cli­mate, set off earth­quakes, volca­noes remo­tely through the use of elec­tro­ma­gne­tic waves.”

The cele­bra­ted alter­na­tive Nobel-Prize-winning sci­en­tist Dr. Rosa­lie Ber­tell in her book “Pla­net Earth – The Latest Wea­pon of War” named all the geo­phy­si­cal wea­pons sys­tems and the tests that had at that time taken place. She said: “Elec­tro­ma­gne­tic wea­pons have the capa­city to induce effects such as earth­quakes over inter­con­ti­nen­tal dis­tan­ces at tar­gets of their choice any­where on earth, with a power equal to that of large ato­mic explo­si­ons.” She con­fir­med that US mili­tary sci­en­tists are working on wea­t­her sys­tems as a poten­tial wea­pon. “The methods include the inten­si­fi­ca­tion of storms and the diver­sion of vapour streams in the earth’s atmo­s­phere in order to pro­duce tar­ge­ted droughts or floods.” She takes a posi­tion vehe­mently against the con­duc­ting of environ­men­tal war­fare, exp­li­citly iden­ti­fy­ing pro­duc­tion of earth­quakes as a wea­pon of war in prac­tical application.

In 2005 the India Daily wrote that several other sta­tes pos­sess simi­lar instal­la­ti­ons for tec­to­nic and wea­t­her war­fare and more and more sta­tes are under­ta­king detec­tion of the mani­pu­la­ti­ons and devi­sing counter-measures.

Chem­trails / Geo-Engineering

The scat­te­ring of poly­mers and metal­lic or sulp­hate par­ti­cles from pla­nes over wide areas of the earth’s sur­face is also play­ing an import­ant role in glo­bal wea­t­her mani­pu­la­tion, which is offi­ci­ally descri­bed as “geo­en­gi­nee­ring”. The Inter­go­vern­men­tal Panel on Cli­mate Change, the planet’s “wea­t­her coun­cil” as early as 2001 favou­red the dis­tri­bu­tion of metal­lic par­ti­cles to reflect back into space the rays of the sun; albeit with the side-effect of pro­du­cing a “white sky” (IPCC 2001-S.333–334).

Defen­ding the atmo­s­phere in the US Con­gress in 2001, several-times would-be pre­si­den­tial can­di­date for the US Demo­crats Den­nis Kuci­nich cited the Space Pre­ser­va­tion Act, men­tio­ning chem­trails, tec­to­nic wea­pons sys­tems and mind control.

On 12.01.2011 the for­mer head of the FBI in Los Ange­les Ted Gun­der­son took a posi­tion on chem­trails, say­ing among other things: “The death dumps, other­wise known as che­mi­cal trails, are being drop­ped and sprayed throug­hout the United Sta­tes and Eng­land, Scot­land, Ire­land, and Nort­hern Europe. I have per­so­nally seen them not only in the United Sta­tes, but in Mexico and in Canada. Birds are dying around the world. Fish are dying by the hund­reds of thousands around the world. This is geno­cide. This is poi­son. This is mur­der by the United Nati­ons. This ele­ment wit­hin our society that is doing this must be stop­ped. I hap­pen to know of two of the loca­ti­ons where the air­planes are that dump this crap on us.

Four of the pla­nes are out of the Air Natio­nal Guard in Lin­coln, Nebraska. And, the other pla­nes are out of Fort Sill, Okla­homa. I per­so­nally have obser­ved the pla­nes that were stan­ding still in Nebraska – Lin­coln, Nebraska – at the Air Natio­nal Guard. They have no mar­kings on them. They are huge, bomber-like air­planes with no mar­kings. This is a crime: a crime against huma­nity, a crime against Ame­rica, a crime against the citi­zens of this great coun­try. The must be stop­ped. WHAT IS WRONG WITH CONGRESS? This has an effect on their popu­la­tion, and their people, and their fri­ends, and their rela­ti­ves, and them­sel­ves. What’s wrong with them? What’s wrong with the pilots who are fly­ing these air­planes and dum­ping this crap, this poi­son, on their own fami­lies? Some­body has to do some­thing about it. Some­body in Con­gress has to step for­ward and stop it now. Thank you. I’m Ted Gunderson.”

The above­men­tio­ned alter­na­tive Nobel Prize win­ner Dr. Rosa­lie Ber­tell on 3rd May 2005 said: “I think that chem­trails are also a vehi­cle for other forms of bio­lo­gi­cal and che­mi­cal warfare.”

Green­peace wants to know not­hing about all this:
When Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel pre­sen­ted the sub­jects of “chem­trails” and “HAARP” to Green­peace, sub­mit­ting nume­rous docu­ments for fur­ther rese­arch, he was told in 2005 that “these mat­ters are not com­pa­ti­ble with the objec­tives of Greenpeace.”

It is beyond com­pre­hen­sion that a world-wide environ­men­tal orga­niza­tion such as Green­peace should remain silent about all these sub­jects, which rep­re­sent a mas­sive threat not only to human beings but to the planet’s living environ­ment in toto.

Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel has reams of mate­rial in his pos­ses­sion on these sub­jects, and could pro­vide even more.

Action– fotos + videos on www.chemtrail.de

Olden­burg, 07.10.2011
Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel
Wilh. Kempinstr.55
26133 Olden­burg
T: 0441–46703