YOU ARE NOW ELECTRO-SENSITIVE

by bill­der Sun­day April 04, 2004 at 09:37 AM

You real­ly are.

The spray­ing of pow­de­red mate­ri­als throug­hout the ski­es of the world is hap­pe­ning on a dai­ly basis ever­y­whe­re. This has been going on with incre­asing fre­quen­cy sin­ce the so-cal­led “Elec­tion” of the bush fami­ly to lea­der­ship posi­ti­ons in America.

Hard­ly a day goes by now whe­re jets do not lay down che­mi­cal trails in grids and cano­pys. This is sup­port for tech­no­lo­gy being used against the popu­la­ti­on of the world. Its main goal is con­trol of food and water through wea­ther modi­fi­ca­ti­on, but the vast vast expen­se of this pro­gram, as well as the clas­si­fied tech­no­lo­gy of cor­po­ra­ti­ons such as Time Domain Cor­po­ra­ti­on, sug­gest even grea­ter goals are being obtai­ned in con­junc­tion with the attempt to lock down food and water. Mons­an­to Cor­po­ra­ti­on is also deep­ly invol­ved in this ille­gal take-over, and many others. Elec­t­ro-sen­si­ti­vi­ty of the soil its­elf will only allow gm crops to crow eventually.

Ioniza­ti­on of the­se spray­ed par­tic­les also cau­ses many forms of radia­ti­on to rain down upon the as yet unsu­spec­ting popu­lace of the world, as well as len­sing pro­grams to dehy­dra­te land and dry up water sources. The first lie of the NWO ani­mals is that a shield is nee­ded becau­se the atmo­sphe­re has been deple­ted — it is too bad that THEY them­sel­ves can deple­te the atmo­sphe­re at any time and thus CREATE THAT NEED.

The true crux of the pro­gram is to crea­te con­duc­ti­vi­ty within all life on the sur­face of the pla­net, by spray­ing con­duc­ti­ve mate­ri­als which ine­vi­ta­b­ly end up in the soil, the water, the air, and the food. Gre­at inroads have been made in the last few deca­des con­cer­ning elec­tro­nic coer­ci­on through thought ent­rain­ment and other elec­tro­nic sti­mu­lus; some examp­les of this include Paper­clip, mk-ultra, pan­do­ra, and the work of the so-cal­led doc­tor delgado.

http://www.raven1.net/kilde1.htm

Spray­ing of con­duc­ti­ve mate­ri­als was pre­ce­ded just slight­ly with the wide­spread use of cell pho­nes, and it is a fair and reasonable con­ten­ti­on that the cell pho­nes are just a cover for the deploy­ment of broad­cast towers ever­y­whe­re, a neces­sa­ry adjunct to elec­tro­nic mind con­trol and auto­ma­ted law enforce­ment. Look around your­sel­ves, the evi­dence is befo­re your eyes. Towers ever­y­whe­re and dai­ly spray­ing of che­mi­cals in Ame­ri­can ski­es, as well as all over the world, will give you a fair clue of just what the new world order is all about.

http://www.bariumblues.com/towers_2.htm

Elec­t­ro-sen­si­ti­vi­ty is being crea­ted so that the popu­lace will respond in a pre­dic­ta­ble way to various forms of broad­cast ener­gy being used for con­trol and coer­ci­on. The­re are also implants being used on a broad sca­le, in places such as veterans hos­pi­tals, and den­tal labs, and the­se are used also for coer­ci­on, and act as track­ing devices too.

http://www.fightback.grimfacts.org/Tracking_Humans.html

Broad­cast towers are sim­ply the means to con­trol the mass. The hard cases are tar­ge­ted with hand­held and air­born fields which cau­se acce­le­ra­ted growth of fun­gu­s­es and can­cers the­se free­dom figh­ters have been inten­tio­nall­ly infec­ted with.

No one can escape this attack on the world by a few degra­ded non-human ani­mals, and only mass awa­re­ness and vio­lent rem­oval will end this dep­re­da­ti­on on humanity.

And remem­ber this: Rus­sia per­fec­ted and used this Tes­la-Like tech­no­lo­gy long befo­re the United States.

Also visit:
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com
http://www.carnicom.com

Source: http://www.chapelhill.indymedia.org/news/2004/04/9742.php (excerpt)

CHEMTRAIL SUNSCREENTAUGHT IN US SCHOOLS

by Wil­liam Thomas

A is for Apple.

B is for Boy.

C is for Chemtrails.

At least this is what one Ame­ri­can father found while paging through his child’s sci­ence book. SmT was asto­nis­hed to find seventh gra­d­ers being taught about chem­trails. And geo­en­gi­neeering their home planet.

Anyo­ne with ques­ti­on about the »spray pro­grams« he now says, »should per­haps just ask their kids.«

The chem­trails sec­tion is found in the Cent­re Point Lear­ning Sci­ence I Essen­ti­al Inter­ac­tions sci­ence book. Under »Solu­ti­ons for Glo­bal Warm­ing«, sec­tion 5.19 fea­tures a pho­to of a big mul­ti-engi­ne jet sport­ing a fami­li­ar orange/red paint scheme.

The cap­ti­on reads: »Figu­re 1- Jet engi­nes run­ning on richer fuel would add par­tic­les to the atmo­sphe­re to crea­te a sunscreen«.

The logo on the pla­ne says: »Par­tic­le Air«.

»I kid you not,« SmT insists. »Why did I spend all of that time doing rese­arch when I could have just asked my kids?«

Hel­ping habi­tua­te child­ren to a life under lethal suns­hi­ne and »pro­tec­ti­ve« spray pla­nes, this trip­py text­book urges young rea­ders to »Use Sun Block«. But its aut­hors are refer­ring to a sun­screen spread across the sky.

»Could we deli­bera­te­ly add par­tic­les to the atmo­sphe­re?« asks the text, befo­re hel­pful­ly sug­gest­ing that »Bur­ning coal adds soot to the air.«

You might be old enough to recoil at such a noti­on. But in a coun­try whe­re down is up and wrong is right, your kids could be lear­ning that what used to be bad and a bum­mer is a now good thing!

RUNNING ON EMPTY

»Be real inte­res­t­ing to see the poli­tics of the folks put­ting this out.« SmT suggests.

In the cur­rent White House, tho­se poli­tics are as »cru­de« as inva­ding oil-rich Iraq over a bogus nuclear thre­at — while per­mit­ting Paki­stan to export atom bomb mate­ri­als to ter­ro­rist orga­niza­ti­ons in return for the chan­ce at an elec­tion-boos­ting cap­tu­re of Osa­ma bin Laden by US forces in the Hin­du Kush later this month. [New Yor­ker Mar1/04]

Why should­n’t the same petrol poli­tics pro­du­ce text­books for child­ren inhe­ri­ting a night­ma­re? Led by a pig­gish petro­le­um pre­si­dent, with most major nati­ons cut­ting back, US oil con­sump­ti­on is rising as stee­p­ly as sup­pli­es of cheap cru­de are collapsing.

The coal con­nec­tion is this: In order to brief­ly »stretch the gli­de« of the fast-loo­ming end of cheap oil that will utter­ly trans­form life as we know it, America’s unelec­ted oil pre­si­dent recent­ly revo­ked pol­lu­ti­on regu­la­ti­ons on more than 2,000 of the nation’s big­gest pol­lu­ting coal-fired power plants.

Iro­ni­cal­ly, this move — like so many others made by an oil-add­led White House — will only has­ten an Ear­thwreck as shat­te­ring to all onboard as a lurch­ing squa­re-rig­ger striking a rocky reef. Except our space­ship is sur­roun­ded by the cold, irra­dia­ted vacu­um of deep space.

It turns out that a sin­gle 150-mega­watt coal-bur­ning power plant pro­du­ces more emis­si­ons than 300,000 cars. Ter­med an »Extre­me Human health Hazard« by the EPA, micro­sco­pic coal par­tic­les also rot lungs, stop hearts, kill lakes, cho­ke cities — and stunt the lives of school kids with dead­ly sulp­hu­ric acid rain. [AP Aug27/03; LA Times Aug28/03]

Air­bor­ne soot also blocks sun­light, lowe­ring green­house tem­pe­ra­tures. Vol­ca­nic erup­ti­ons like Kra­ka­toa and Pina­tu­bo — and glo­be-cir­cling soot from 1,000 bur­ning oil wells during Desert Storm — bel­ched enough sulp­hur into the stra­to­sphe­re to cau­se a plun­ge in world tem­pe­ra­tures, tem­po­r­a­ri­ly slo­wing glo­bal warming.

World sci­en­tists loo­king at deli­bera­te­ly put­ting mega­tons more sulp­hur into a clo­sed, recir­cu­la­ting atmo­sphe­re alre­a­dy smog­gy enough to depres­ses orbi­ting astro­nauts, deci­ded that a sulp­hur sun­screen is not a swift idea.

But not this Jr. High sci­ence text. »Crea­ting eit­her kind of sun­screen would be cheap,« it tells young rea­ders. As if »cheap« is the only consideration.

Even this cla­im is bogus. SmT says he loo­ked, but the sec­tion on the down­stream cos­ts asso­cia­ted with the health and envi­ron­men­tal effects of mas­si­ve coal pol­lu­ti­on — or the 10 mil­li­on tons of a che­mi­cal sun­screen sug­gested by the late Edward Tel­ler — »see­med to have been left out.«

Dit­to »the cost to the solar indus­try«. Or cumu­la­ti­ve impacts on kids, crit­ters and plants on which our future depends.

DIMMING PROSPECTS

Sun­light is alre­a­dy on the way out. Repea­ted­ly expres­sing shock at how quick­ly our space colony’s life-sup­port sys­tems are fai­ling, sci­en­tists are fin­ding levels of solar radia­ti­on rea­ching the Earth’s sur­face decre­asing by almost 3% a decade.

»Glo­bal Dim­ming« is too small to detect with the eye. »But it has impli­ca­ti­ons for ever­y­thing from cli­ma­te chan­ge to solar power and even the future sus­taina­bi­li­ty of plant pho­to­syn­the­sis,« reports the Guardian.

All tho­se jet-pro­pel­led vaca­ti­ons and car trips to the cor­ner store add up. Sin­ce 1960, 10% less sun­light has rea­ched Earth’s inha­bi­tants. Levels of solar radia­ti­on rea­ching parts of the for­mer coal-bel­ching Soviet Uni­on are down almost 20%.

In any green­house, the rule of a green thumb is that every 1% decrease in solar radia­ti­on results in a 1% drop in plant productivity.

»It’s actual­ly quite a big deal,” says Gra­ham Far­quhar, a cli­ma­te sci­en­tist at the Aus­tra­li­an Natio­nal Uni­ver­si­ty in Can­ber­ra. But get this: Far­quhar does­n’t think that iden­ti­fied pol­lut­ants, »by them­sel­ves would be able to pro­du­ce this amount of glo­bal dim­ming.« [Guar­di­an Dec18/03]

The baf­f­led Aus­sie should check out the role of con­trails in tur­ning off sun­light. Sin­ce the Jet Age took off in the 1960s, nor­mal con­den­sa­ti­on trails from five mil­li­on jet flights every year have been found to block 10% of sun­light across Euro­pe and the USA. Over hea­vi­ly traf­fi­cked Atlan­tic and Ame­ri­can air-rou­tes, arti­fi­ci­al cloud cover cau­sed by jet engi­ne pol­lut­ants has increased 20%. [Chem­trails Con­firm­ed ’04]

Chem­trails are ano­ther major sun­block. Mea­su­re­ments taken with a cali­bra­ted pho­to­me­ter by Clif­ford Car­ni­com in San­ta Fe show a rapid reduc­tion in sun­light — from a value of 97% on a “clear day” to around 80% during the ear­ly stages of hea­vy chem­trai­ling. Using a simp­le UV radia­ti­on meter, this repor­ter has con­firm­ed simi­lar drops in sun­light beneath arti­fi­ci­al »chem­casts« on Canada’s west coast.

WHAT JANE AND DICK DIDN’T LEARN IN SCHOOL TODAY

In a coun­try who­se self-appoin­ted regime rou­ti­ne­ly cen­sors sci­en­ti­fic stu­dies, at least some 7th gra­de sci­ence are more focu­sed on indoc­tri­na­ting kids with ris­ky tech­no »quick-fixes« than con­scious con­ser­va­ti­on and com­mon sense.

For­get sci­ence. SmT gazed in dis­be­lief at ano­ther school­book pic­tu­re show­ing a heli­c­op­ter see­ding the oce­an with iron par­tic­les. The­se despe­ra­te »IronX« expe­ri­ments did inde­ed trig­ger plank­ton »blooms« that, in turn, trans­fer­red tons of atmo­sphe­ric C02 under­wa­ter as tho­se car­bon-inha­ling crit­ters even­tual­ly died and sank to the seafloor.

But – oops! – his kid’s sci­ence book fails to men­ti­on that the resul­ting oce­an blooms also sucked all available oxy­gen from the sea­wa­ter, suf­fo­ca­ting all mari­ne life in mas­si­ve, spre­a­ding »dead zones«. [Chem­trails Con­firm­ed ’04]

Whe­re are the pic­tu­re, SmT won­ders, »of peo­p­le plan­ting trees, or tur­ning down ther­mo­stats, or bicy­cling, or any of the other ways not to add to the problem?«

Though his fami­ly gave up the idea of home schoo­ling, he says, »it’s per­haps time to reconsider.«

Per­haps it’s also time to recon­sider sta­te-spon­so­red brain­wa­shing. And other escala­ting con­se­quen­ces of our car­bon addic­tion, as well.

http://willthomas.net/Articles/Chemtrailstextbook.htm