Weapons that use Time-Reversed Electromagnetic Waves

Tom Bear­den LTD. Colo­nel a.D. US-Forces :

At the end of WWII, the Soviet Uni­on obtai­ned the cream of the crop of Germany’s radar sci­en­tists and infrared scientists.
At that time, the Ger­man sci­en­ti­fic team led the world in the theo­ry and tech­no­lo­gy of radar absor­bing mate­ri­als (RAM) and radar cross sec­tion. For exam­p­le, some lea­ding Wes­tern radar experts belie­ve that the Ger­man sci­en­tists had alre­a­dy advan­ced the theo­ry of radar cross sec­tion bey­ond whe­re Wes­tern sci­en­tists have arri­ved at today. Radar cross sec­tion sci­ence is the »heart« of modern radar tech­no­lo­gy, coun­ter­me­a­su­res, and counter-countermeasures.
The theo­ry of RAM tech­no­lo­gy is pre­cis­e­ly what is nee­ded to deve­lop and design pha­se con­ju­ga­te mir­rors for radar fre­quen­cy bands. Pha­se con­ju­ga­te mir­rors are capa­ble of pro­du­cing a time-rever­sed (TR) wave in direct respon­se to a recei­ved ordi­na­ry wave. The mir­ror may be powerful­ly »pum­ped« with ener­gy to pro­du­ce a very lar­ge ampli­fi­ca­ti­on of the time-rever­sed wave.
Just after WWII, the Soviets also moun­ted a tru­ly mas­si­ve pro­gram to obtain and review all the sci­en­ti­fic lite­ra­tu­re of the West This mate­ri­al was com­ple­te­ly re-exami­ned and digested, in a deli­be­ra­te search for a major new tech­no­lo­gi­cal »break- through« area. Not­hing simi­lar to this has ever been done in the West.
By 1950, the Soviets pro­ba­b­ly had dis­co­ver­ed pha­se con­ju­ga­ti­on and the time- rever­sed wave, in their radar pro­grams using the Ger­man radar sci­en­tists. Their re- search would cer­tain­ly have reve­a­led that the time-rever­sed wave is a solu­ti­on to the wave equa­ti­on, and hence the phe­no­me­non is uni­ver­sal to all waves and fre­quen­cy regi­ons, under appro­pria­te non­line­ar circumstances.
We stress the fact that from the begin­ning the Soviets have always led the rest of the world in non­line­ar sci­ence and mathematics.
Thus by the mid-50’s, the Soviets would have moun­ted an inten­si­ve natio­nal deve­lo­p­ment pro­gram on the­se radar TR wave wea­pons. If so, the Soviet Uni­on has now had the equi­va­lent of some seven or eight Man­hat­tan Pro­jects, back-to-back, in the deve­lo­p­ment, stock­pi­ling, and deploy­ment of TR wave wea­pon sys­tems. At least fifth gene­ra­ti­on Soviet TR wea­pons have been deve­lo­ped and deployed.
This is a mat­ter of the grea­test importance to the U.S. — and one which the U.S. intel­li­gence and sci­en­ti­fic com­mu­ni­ties have lar­ge­ly missed.
We par­ti­cu­lar­ly stress that the time-rever­sed wave phe­no­me­non is a uni­ver­sal phe­no­me­non of natu­re, not just a flu­ke, and not just a »non­line­ar optics« phe­no­me­non. It is a solu­ti­on to the wave equa­ti­on and, as such, it appli­es to every kind of wave. Elec­tro­ma­gne­tic, sound, magne­to­hy­dro­dy­na­mic, and other radia­ting sys­tems all exhi­bit the phe­no­me­non under appro­pria­te non­line­ar conditions.
Hundreds of Wes­tern papers deal­ing with time-rever­sed waves are now in the open sci­en­ti­fic lite­ra­tu­re-most of them deal­ing with non-line­ar optics. Howe­ver, the prin­ci­ples of the time-rever­sed wave are well-estab­lished, and known to app­ly to waves in general.
Com­pared to a nor­mal wave, a time-rever­sed wave has start­lingly dif­fe­rent wea­pon capabilities.
Such a wave pre­cis­e­ly retraces the path of the ordi­na­ry wave that sti­mu­la­ted it to be for­med. So it pos­s­es­ses an »invi­si­ble wire« through space, back to the ori­gi­nal posi­ti­on of wha­te­ver emit­ted its sti­mu­lus wave.
Fur­ther, the time-rever­sed wave con­ti­nu­al­ly con­ver­ges upon its invi­si­ble »back- track­ing« path. It does not diver­ge and spread its ener­gy, in con­tra­dis­tinc­tion to nor­mal waves.
Using seve­ral simp­le sche­mes (par­ti­cu­lar­ly pum­ped 4‑wave mixing), extre­me­ly lar­ge ampli­fi­ca­ti­on of the time-rever­sed (TR) wave can be chea­p­ly and rea­di­ly accomplished.
A start­ling wea­pons capa­bi­li­ty the­r­e­fo­re emer­ges when ampli­fied TR waves are gene­ra­ted in respon­se to recei­ved signals from a distant target:
(1) If any signal at all can be recei­ved from a distant tar­get, a return TR signal of extre­me power can be deli­ver­ed direct­ly to that tar­get Almost all of the trans­mit­ted TR signal ener­gy will arri­ve at and in the distant tar­get, even through a high­ly non­line­ar medi­um or under scat­te­ring con­di­ti­ons. Hard­ly any of the ener­gy will be lost enrou­te. If the tar­get is fast-moving, a »lead cor­rec­tion« signal can be cal­cu­la­ted and added to steer the return path.
(2) Sin­ce real-time holo­gra­phy can rea­di­ly be accom­plished using TR waves — and wit­hout first making holo­grams, geo­me­tri­cal forms (balls, shapes, hemi­sphe­ri­cal shells, etc) of ener­gy can be crea­ted rea­di­ly by inter­fe­ro­me­try (crossed beam tech­ni­ques). Sin­ce the TR wave car­ri­ers do not disper­se with distance, the­se inter­fe­rence ener­gy forms can be assem­bled by crossed TR wave beams at gre­at distances-even hundreds of thou­sands of miles. The ener­gy appearing in such a distant­ly crea­ted ener­gy form is limi­t­ed only by the amount one cares to put in at the ampli­fied trans­mit­ting end.
Thus the radar its­elf now beco­mes a powerful, all-around wea­pon. With a TR wave adjunct, once the radar recei­ves a return signal from a tar­get, an extre­me­ly powerful TR wave pul­se can be gene­ra­ted, and all the ener­gy in that pul­se can be uner­rin­gly retur­ned to the distant tar­get from which the return was received.
Even a pas­si­ve (recei­ve only) radar may be used tog­e­ther with a TR wave adjunct to accom­plish the same direc­ted ener­gy des­truc­tion of the distant tar­get emit­ting the signals recei­ved by the radar.
Radio recei­ver-trans­mit­ters may also employ simp­le TR wave adjuncts to pro­vi­de a lar­ge num­ber of com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons jam­mers and »direc­ted ener­gy wea­pons,« capa­ble of jamming and/or des­troy­ing ene­my radio trans­mit­ters at app­re­cia­ble distances.
The Soviets have inten­si­ve­ly deve­lo­ped such TR wave wea­pons sin­ce the 1950’s. In Janu­ary 1960, Khrush­chev was pro­ba­b­ly refer­ring to the­se wea­pons when he repor­ted to the Soviet Pre­si­di­um the forth­co­ming advent of fan­ta­stic wea­pons, then in advan­ced Soviet development.
Pri­or to Khrushchev’s announce­ment, the Soviets had begun radia­ting the U. S. Embas­sy in Moscow with sca­lar EM waves and pha­se con­ju­ga­te ener­gy, modu­la­ted upon weak micro­wa­ve car­ri­er beams. Later the­se beams were used to indu­ce ill­nesses and blood chan­ges in Embas­sy per­son­nel. (We will short­ly dis­cuss how the Soviets could indu­ce dise­a­se at a distance, elec­tro­ma­gne­ti­cal­ly). The micro­wa­ve radia­ti­on con­tin­ued inter­mit­tent­ly, in spi­te of the objec­tions of seve­ral U.S. Pre­si­dents. U.S. stu­dies fai­led to com­pre­hend what was being done.
The Embas­sy radia­ti­on was and is a high-level intel­li­gence pro­be: Sti­mu­la­te and affect the U.S. Ambassa­dor, a high-level tar­get. Atten­ti­on by the CIA, NSA, Sta­te Depart­ment, DIA, the U.S. Pre­si­dent, etc. is gua­ran­teed. Puz­zled, they will turn to the U.S. sci­en­ti­fic com­mu­ni­ty for an expl­ana­ti­on. The sci­en­ti­fic com­mu­ni­ty will try to explain the micro­wa­ve radia­ti­on, using the best of its EM know­ledge. By the U. S. coun­ter­ac­tions taken or not taken at the Embas­sy site, the Soviets know with 100% cer­tain­ty whe­ther or not the U.S. has dis­co­ver­ed TR wave wea­pons, elec­tro­ma­gne­tic dise­a­se con­trol, etc. — and whe­ther we have deve­lo­ped defen­ses against such weapons.
Sin­ce the begin­ning, of cour­se, our actions — or lack of them — at the U.S. Embas­sy have con­sis­t­ent­ly reve­a­led to the Soviets that we have no know­ledge of, and hence no defen­ses against, TR wave tech­no­lo­gy and the sca­lar elec­tro­ma­gne­tics (elec­tro­gra­vi­ta­ti­on) that accom­pa­nies the phenomenon.
Soviet TR wave radar wea­pons also pro­vi­de a con­ve­ni­ent mecha­nism for accom­pli­shing nuclear wea­pon kill. A tar­get struck by a powerful TR wave pul­se gene­ra­tes a time-rever­sed back-pul­se due to non­linea­ri­ties in the tar­get medi­um. In the non­line­ar medi­um of the explo­ding or fuzing tar­get, the two pul­ses (which are 180 degrees out of pha­se with each other) modu­la­te each other, locking tog­e­ther into a sca­lar EM wave or pul­se. This sca­lar EM pul­se has zero elec­tro­ma­gne­tic force field resul­tants, but is a vio­lent fluc­tua­ti­on of the ener­gy den­si­ty of local space­time. Rigo­rous­ly it is a local gra­vi­ta­tio­nal pul­se wave, by defi­ni­ti­on. Fur­ther, it is far more powerful than »nor­mal« gra­vi­ta­tio­nal waves. This sca­lar EM pul­se does not react with the orbi­tal elec­tron shells of an atom, but pas­ses direct­ly into the nucleus and is absor­bed the­re. This rai­ses the nucleus to an exci­ted sta­te, incre­asing its poten­ti­al (trap­ped ener­gy). If the nucleus can­not with­stand this increase in poten­ti­al ener­gy, it direct­ly fis­si­ons. If the nucleus with­stands the increased poten­ti­al, it then imme­dia­te­ly decays from the exci­ted sta­te by sim­ply emit­ting a time-rever­sed EM wave.
Any radio­ac­ti­ve nucleus is alre­a­dy »tee­ter-tot­te­ring« toward nuclear decay, so to speak, and it will instant­ly decay radio­ac­tively when struck by a signi­fi­cant sca­lar poten­ti­al pul­se. Thus a TR wave radar wea­pon can deli­ver a powerful TR pul­se against a distant vehic­le car­ry­ing a nuclear war­head, and the resul­tant EG pul­se pene­t­ra­ting the nuclear mate­ri­al of the war­head will elec­tro­gra­vi­ta­tio­nal­ly explo­de it in a full-order nuclear detonation.
The­r­e­fo­re, when using such wea­pons, extre­me care must be taken to avo­id inad­ver­t­ent­ly puls­ing one’s own near­by nuclear wea­pons or nuclear mate­ri­al. In attack­ing distant ground tar­gets, one must be careful not to deto­na­te near­by nuclear wea­pons, nuclear power­plants, or stored nuclear mate­ri­al-even at some distance from the tar­get. Other­wi­se, lar­ge-sca­le nuclear fall­out will be expe­ri­en­ced over a world­wi­de area, and unac­cep­ta­ble »boo­me­rang« self-dama­ge to the atta­cker hims­elf may be incur­red. The more powerful the TR pul­se employ­ed, the grea­ter the safe­ty sepa­ra­ti­on bet­ween the struck tar­get and stored nuclear mate­ri­el must be to pre­vent unac­cep­ta­ble »boo­me­rang« lar­ge-sca­le fallout
Also, lar­ge TR wave inter­fe­ro­me­ter wea­pons, such as the Woodpe­cker sys­tems, usual­ly first pro­du­ce very powerful, sca­lar EM »stan­ding wave« beams by con­ti­nuous­ly trans­mit­ting (in the beam) both a nor­mal EM wave and its pha­se con­ju­ga­te, modu­la­ted (locked) tog­e­ther to pro­du­ce a »zero EM vec­tor resul­tant« elec­tro­gra­vi­ta­tio­nal (EG) wave. Inter­fe­rence of two of the­se sca­lar EM beams in the tar­ge­ted area, plus inter­nal scan­ning within the beam by other signals, allows EM effects — of eit­her nor­mal EM ener­gy or time-rever­sed EM ener­gy — to be pro­du­ced and con­trol­led at very pre­cise loca­ti­ons within the broad inter­fe­rence area.
Each such huge »sca­lar EM stan­ding wave« beam repres­ents a gigan­tic elec­tro­gra­vi­ta­tio­nal stan­ding wave, and hence a giant oscil­la­ting poten­ti­al in space­time. This stan­ding wave repres­ents a sort of gigan­tic »capa­ci­tor«, or accu­mu­la­tor of infold­ed ener­gy. Enorm­ous ener­gy may be coll­ec­ted in this poten­ti­al, char­ged-up over a peri­od of time. »Shor­tout« of this giant capa­ci­tor — by trans­mit­ter fail­ure — can result in a lar­ge flash-over dischar­ge of the EG ener­gy into the local earth, pro­du­cing a mas­si­ve EG ground wave that can be enorm­ously destructive.
Thus one must careful­ly pro­tect the TR wave wea­pon sys­tem from inad­ver­tent dischar­ge of lar­ge EG pul­ses into the earth at the local site, due to trans­mit­ter fail­ure, shor­touts, etc. Other­wi­se one’s own nuclear wea­pons or faci­li­ties may be explo­ded — even at some distance — by the EG pul­se ground wave pro­du­ced. One’s com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons and elec­tro­nics instal­la­ti­ons, for exam­p­le, can be kno­cked out at an even grea­ter distance.
For exam­p­le, in the win­ter of 1957–58, a lar­ge Soviet TR wave pro­to­ty­pe wea­pon at Kysh­tym, near the Urals, appar­ent­ly suf­fe­r­ed a cata­stro­phic trans­mit­ter fail­ure, dischar­ging a powerful sca­lar EM (elec­tro­gra­vi­ta­tio­nal, or EG) pul­se into the earth. This huge EG pul­se struck the ato­mic was­tes stored near­by, caus­ing the radio­ac­ti­ve nuclei to imme­dia­te­ly decay. In other words, the near­by ato­mic was­tes explo­ded — just as eye-wit­nesses repor­ted. Dead­ly radio­ac­ti­ve con­ta­mi­na­ti­on spread across a major regi­on, and exists to this day.
After this acci­dent, the Soviets would have deve­lo­ped much more ela­bo­ra­te safe­ty cir­cuits and devices and imple­men­ted them into their TR wave weapons.
Even so, in April 1986, the explo­si­ve erup­ti­on of a reac­tor at Cher­no­byl was almost cer­tain­ly cau­sed by an acci­den­tal cata­stro­phic fail­ure of a lar­ge TR Woodpe­cker trans­mit­ter about 30 kilo­me­ters away. The sud­den fail­ure of the East-to-West Woodpe­cker trans­mit­ter was posi­tively detec­ted by engi­neer Bill Bise. All safe­ty cir­cuits at the site would have been instant­ly acti­va­ted, despera­te­ly and slow­ly drai­ning off the huge »stan­ding wave« poten­ti­al built up by the weapon.
The Soviets would have imme­dia­te­ly shut down the reac­tors at Cher­no­byl as a precaution.
Some hours later, the trans­mit­ter safe­ty devices final­ly fai­led, and a much smal­ler, though still signi­fi­cant, rem­nant EG pul­se was dischar­ged into the earth, spre­a­ding out in a ground wave. The first radio­ac­ti­ve mate­ri­al — the fuel rods in one of the hap­less, shut­down Cher­no­byl reac­tors — encoun­te­red by the EG ground wave pul­se recei­ved it and imme­dia­te­ly erupt­ed radioactively.
Had the full EG pul­se escaped the stri­cken trans­mit­ter, all four reac­tors at Cher­no­byl would have vio­lent­ly explo­ded, and dead­ly nuclear fall­out would have rai­ned down over a wide area of the earth. Had the reac­tors not been shut down and the con­trol rods inser­ted »full-in« to dam­pen the radio­ac­ti­vi­ty, a far grea­ter radio­ac­ti­ve erup­ti­on — pro­ba­b­ly a nuclear explo­si­on — of the struck reac­tor would have occurred.
In May 1960, a pro­to­ty­pe TR wave radar wea­pon was used to down Gary Powers’ high-fly­ing U‑2 air­craft over the Soviet Uni­on. Powers repor­ted a flash, as if from an explo­si­on near him, but the flash per­sis­ted. This is almost cer­tain­ly the signa­tu­re of a TR wave weapon.
In April 1963, the first lar­ge stra­te­gic Soviet TR wave wea­pons beca­me ope­ra­tio­nal. The­se wea­pons were used to elec­tro­ma­gne­ti­cal­ly deaden the elec­tri­cal con­trols of the U.S.S. Thres­her ato­mic sub­ma­ri­ne on April 10, 1963, and to pro­du­ce a huge under­wa­ter elec­tro­ma­gne­tic blast 100 miles north of Puer­to Rico on April 11, 1963.
Sin­ce the 1960’s, the Soviets have pos­s­es­sed a 100% effec­ti­ve defen­se against U.S. and Euro­pean stra­te­gic bom­bers and mis­siles. The ear­ly sys­tems deploy­ed in the Soviet Uni­on were mid­cour­se and ter­mi­nal pha­se sys­tems. The Soviets would also have reli­ed upon addi­tio­nal TR wave wea­pons sys­tems, deploy­ed as adjuncts to radar sys­tems aboard rese­arch ships and traw­lers, to be able to attack U.S. mis­siles and bom­bers in their launch and ear­ly mid­cour­se phases.
The­se Soviet defen­si­ve TR wave sys­tems also could easi­ly accom­plish nuclear wea­pon kill, and by their natu­re may have alre­a­dy been immu­ne to the Ste­alth technology.
Older Soviet radars, using TR wave adjuncts, beco­me total­ly new wea­pons having start­ling and heret­ofo­re unsu­spec­ted capa­bi­li­ties against mis­siles and air­craft. For that reason, the Soviets hap­pi­ly con­ti­nue to ope­ra­te and main­tain thou­sands of older radar sys­tems that by Wes­tern radar stan­dards, are see­mingly obsolete.
Hundreds of inci­dents of Soviet tests of the­se TR wave wea­pon sys­tems have been obser­ved around the world, and repor­ted in the open lite­ra­tu­re as puz­zling or anoma­lous phenomena.
In the 1960’s, in Sibe­ria, Vlail Kaz­nache­yev and his rese­ar­chers accom­plished enorm­ous expe­ri­men­ta­ti­on pro­ving that cel­lu­lar death and dise­a­se — of any type whatsoe­ver — could be trans­mit­ted and indu­ced elec­tro­ma­gne­ti­cal­ly. This team went on secret­ly to pha­se con­ju­ga­te (time rever­se) the »death pho­ton« signals, to show that any cel­lu­lar death and dise­a­se can be rever­sed or »cured« elec­tro­ma­gne­ti­cal­ly as well.
The lat­ter work would have been done under the auspi­ces and tight con­trol of the Soviet KGB, sin­ce all pha­se con­ju­ga­ti­on (time rever­sal) wea­pons effects are under the KGB, both for deve­lo­p­ment and deploy­ment. Obvious­ly the »elec­tro­ma­gne­tic anti­do­te« work of Kaz­nache­yev was not published, becau­se it pro­vi­ded a powerful coun­ter-BW war­fa­re capa­bi­li­ty of gre­at stra­te­gic importance to the Soviet Union.
Thus in the late 1960’s, the Soviet Uni­on beca­me the only nati­on on earth to achie­ve the capa­bi­li­ty of rapidly (within one or two hours) deve­lo­ping an elec­tro­ma­gne­tic anti­do­te for lethal new bio­lo­gi­cal war­fa­re (BW) viru­s­es — of any kind whatsoe­ver. The Soviets also deve­lo­ped the capa­bi­li­ty for mass tre­at­ment in this fashion of both the civil popu­lace and the mili­ta­ry forces personnel.
Inde­pen­dent veri­fi­ca­ti­on of the Kaz­nache­yev »death pho­tons« effect has been accom­plished in West Ger­ma­ny (Uni­ver­si­ty of Mar­burg), in Aus­tra­lia (Uni­ver­si­ty of Syd­ney), and in the United Sta­tes (by G. Wilbanks).
Inde­pen­dent pro­of of elec­tro­ma­gne­tic heal­ing of viral dise­a­ses was also accom­plished in the West and lar­ge­ly ignored.
In the late 1960’s and ear­ly 1970’s, a French inven­tor — Antoine Prio­re — built and tes­ted seve­ral lar­ge elec­tro­ma­gne­tic devices that cured thou­sands of cases of ter­mi­nal can­cers and leuk­emi­as in labo­ra­to­ry ani­mals. He work­ed with mem­bers of the pres­ti­gious French Aca­de­my of Sci­en­ces. His work was fun­ded by the French govern­ment and pre­sen­ted to the French Aca­de­my by Robert Cour­ri­er, head of the Bio­lo­gy Sec­tion. His work was sup­pres­sed in the 1970 ’s, and lost when he died.
Prio­re used a plas­ma to accom­plish mul­ti-wave mixing and pha­se con­ju­ga­ti­on (time rever­sal). His time-rever­sed cura­ti­ve signals used a powerful, ripp­ling magne­tic field as a car­ri­er; the magne­tic field gua­ran­teed pene­tra­ti­on of every cell in the body — neces­sa­ry to reach a blood dise­a­se. The ripp­ling of the magne­tic field gua­ran­teed pene­tra­ti­on of the cell’s ato­mic nuclei by nuclear magne­tic reso­nan­ce. Pene­tra­ti­on of the actu­al nuclei of the atoms in the dise­a­sed cell is neces­sa­ry, sin­ce the mas­ter cel­lu­lar con­trol sys­tem (dis­co­ver­ed by Dr. Fritz Albert Popp of West Ger­ma­ny) ope­ra­tes through the cell ’s struc­tu­red sca­lar EM bio­po­ten­ti­al, and this poten­ti­al is cen­te­red in the nuclei of the atoms com­pri­sing the cell.
Note that elec­tri­cal dedif­fe­ren­tia­ti­on of cells at minis­cu­le cur­rent — bet­ween pico­am­pe­res and nano­am­pe­res — has been pro­ven by Robert Becker and other rese­ar­chers. Red cells of the frog, for exam­p­le, have been elec­tri­cal­ly rever­sed through all their deve­lo­p­ment stages. The cells first beco­me round, then deve­lop a scall­o­ped out­line in their mem­bra­nes. Then they beco­me amoe­bo­id and move by means of pseu­do­pods. Their nuclei swell and their DNA beco­mes reac­ti­va­ted. They then rid them­sel­ves of all their hemo­glo­bin and deve­lop a full set of mito­chon­dria and ribo­so­mes. In Becker’s his­to­ric expe­ri­ments, the cells then tur­ned into car­ti­la­ge-forming cells, and final­ly into bone-forming cells. In short, Becker demons­tra­ted dedif­fe­ren­tia­ti­on fol­lo­wed by redif­fe­ren­tia­ti­on into an unre­la­ted cell type — all elec­tri­cal­ly initia­ted with laug­ha­b­ly weak currents.
Thus pro­found cel­lu­lar chan­ges are most cer­tain­ly indu­ci­b­le and con­troll­able elec­tro­ma­gne­ti­cal­ly, by minis­cu­le amounts of poten­ti­als and curr­ents. Priore’s machi­ne appli­ed time-rever­sed EM waves to accom­plish rever­sal from can­ce­rous cells back to nor­mal cells.
Priore’s work essen­ti­al­ly pro­ved that Kaznacheyev’s group would have been able to accom­plish the same thing by pha­se conjugation.
Kaznacheyev’s »death pho­tons« work was pro­ba­b­ly accom­plished much ear­lier than repor­ted in the open lite­ra­tu­re. Thus it pro­ba­b­ly pro­vi­ded a basis to use in the micro­wa­ve radia­ti­on of the U.S. Embas­sy in Moscow, to engen­der blood chan­ges and dise­a­se in tar­ge­ted per­son­nel. Two U.S. ambassa­dors died from a leuk­emia-like dise­a­se, and a third sicke­ned and bled from the ears and nose. Only minis­cu­le levels of EM signals would have been neces­sa­ry to indu­ce such bio­lo­gi­cal conditions.
The pre­sent Woodpe­cker radars pro­ba­b­ly have the capa­bi­li­ty of pro­du­cing simi­lar con­di­ti­ons in distant tar­get popu­la­ti­ons, when­ever the Soviets wish to add the appro­pria­te signals. They also pro­ba­b­ly are capa­ble of kil­ling lar­ge num­bers of the tar­ge­ted popu­la­ti­on, when­ever appro­pria­te Kaz­nache­yev »death signals« are pla­ced upon them.
In the late 1960’s, ano­ther cau­tious Soviet »intel­li­gence pro­be« was used: A paper appeared in the open Soviet lite­ra­tu­re, deal­ing with time-rever­sed waves in the field of non­line­ar optics. Only a few Ame­ri­can opti­cal sci­en­tists see­med to be interested.
In 1972, to focus more U.S. atten­ti­on on their subt­le »intel­li­gence pro­be« of U.S. time-rever­sed wave know­ledge, the Soviets sent two sci­en­tists to Los Ala­mos to brief Ame­ri­can sci­en­tists on opti­cal pha­se con­ju­ga­ti­on. The­re­af­ter many U.S. opti­cal sci­en­tists began to work in the »new field.« Imme­dia­te­ly it was reve­a­led to the Soviet Uni­on that the U.S. had inef­fec­ti­ve know­ledge of pha­se con­ju­ga­ti­on, and that the U.S. had no TR wave tech­no­lo­gy or weapons.
To this day, U.S. theo­re­ti­cal work in pha­se con­ju­ga­ti­on is still cha­rac­te­ri­zed by a fair­ly simp­le over­all math model, obtai­ned by sim­ply »wri­ting down« the neces­sa­ry con­ju­ga­te term. The­re appears to be abso­lut­e­ly no U.S. awa­re­ness of the actu­al phy­si­cal elec­tro­gra­vi­ta­tio­nal mecha­nism that cau­ses the pha­se conjugation/time rever­sal, and no theo­ry of it as such. Its direct appli­ca­ti­on to radars appears to have lar­ge­ly been igno­red in the U.S.
In 1975, the Soviets attempt­ed to obtain a trea­ty with the rest of the world, out­la­wing the deve­lo­p­ment of frightful new wea­pons of mass des­truc­tion — »more frightful than the mind of man had ever ima­gi­ned«, accor­ding to Brezhnev hims­elf. Gro­my­ko intro­du­ced the draft trea­ty into the 1975 ses­si­on of the United Nati­ons Gene­ral Assem­bly. No one knew what the Soviets were refer­ring to.
Fai­ling to obtain the trea­ty, the Soviets in 1975–76 embark­ed on the grea­test mili­ta­ry buil­dup in histo­ry. This buil­dup was not­hing short of a full-fled­ged pre­pa­ra­ti­on to be rea­dy to take over the world, begin­ning in 1985 (the »rea­dy« time per Brezhnev’s 1972 state­ment at a secret Pra­gue mee­ting of Euro­pean Com­mu­nist Par­ty lea­ders). The Soviets met this sche­du­led goal.
As we sta­ted, The Soviets can be immu­ne to any kind of viral bio­lo­gi­cal war­fa­re, any­ti­me they choo­se to be. The use of lethal new viru­s­es thus has beco­me a high­ly favor­ed, low-risk method of war­fa­re for the Soviet Uni­on. The West has no such capa­bi­li­ty against viral war­fa­re, and in fact is total­ly vul­nerable to attack in this man­ner. Both Wes­tern tro­ops and Wes­tern civil popu­la­ti­ons are total­ly defen­se­l­ess against the thre­at of viral bio­lo­gi­cal attack.
A BW strike from a small, hosti­le nati­on or from a few radi­cal ter­ro­rists — or even an inad­ver­tent con­ta­mi­nant spil­la­ge from one of the gre­at many ill-con­trol­led pri­va­te gene­tic expe­ri­ments — can result in the intro­duc­tion of a lethal, high­ly infec­tious new virus that will deci­ma­te the West. Inde­ed, a deli­be­ra­te BW viral attack upon us may alre­a­dy have been unleashed.
In 1971, the U.S. pas­sed the Natio­nal Can­cer Act and declared open war­fa­re on can­cer. Iron Curtain coun­try sci­en­tists were invi­ted to par­ti­ci­pa­te, and they did so with alacri­ty. At the time — iro­ni­cal­ly — pene­tra­ti­on of our recom­bi­nant DNA gene­tics rese­arch was one of the hig­hest prio­ri­ties of the Soviet KGB. Obvious­ly, many KGB scientists/agents were infil­tra­ted into our labs under this pro­gram (some of our can­cer rese­arch labs at Ft. Diet­rich, for exam­p­le, still employ more Com­mu­nist than Ame­ri­can scientists.).
In the­se can­cer labs, ani­mal viru­s­es were repea­ted­ly injec­ted and rein­jec­ted into human cell cul­tures, until new viral strains emer­ged that pre­fer­red human cells. The­se viru­s­es could then be cul­tu­red and the effects (or lack of effects) of various che­mi­cals and drugs against them could be ascertained.
The­se new viru­s­es are exact­ly what one would wish to deve­lop if one were see­king a bio­lo­gi­cal war­fa­re virus to which humans were not resistant, and one which pre­fer­red humans as its host
Some­time during the ear­ly 1970’s, KGB agents who had infil­tra­ted U.S. can­cer rese­arch labo­ra­to­ries may have deli­bera­te­ly con­ta­mi­na­ted the World Health Organization’s small­pox vac­ci­ne with one or more of the lethal new viru­s­es available in the Wes­tern can­cer labo­ra­to­ries. Mas­si­ve WHO small­pox vac­ci­na­ti­on in Afri­ca and other Third World count­ries then resul­ted in the appearance and spread of the AIDS disease.
If this the­sis is true, then AIDS con­sti­tu­tes the first Soviet bio­lo­gi­cal war­fa­re strike against the West, in what can only be cate­go­ri­zed as the ope­ning round in a uni­que new World War III.
With the Kaz­nache­yev tech­ni­ques, the Soviet KGB alre­a­dy has the effec­ti­ve elec­tro­ma­gne­tic anti­do­te against AIDS and other lethal viru­s­es, any­ti­me it wis­hes to employ it. Some Soviet citi­zens, howe­ver, will be allo­wed to die, to ser­ve as a decep­ti­on plan and con­ce­al the true Rus­si­an capa­bi­li­ty. Mean­while, the Third World nati­ons and the West will be devas­ta­ted by the kil­ler disease.
Other lethal viru­s­es are almost cer­tain to fol­low, whe­ther from the Soviets, fana­ti­cal ter­ro­rist groups, or inad­ver­tent pri­va­te con­ta­mi­na­ti­on. Undoub­ted­ly, some of the­se frightful new viru­s­es are not going to be slow (len­ti­vi­rus) agents. Some will likely be high­ly infec­tious and quick-acting, in the man­ner of influ­en­za. Some will be trans­mit­ted suc­cessful­ly by insect vec­tors such as the vor­a­cious new Asi­an Tiger mos­qui­to now spre­a­ding across the Sou­the­ast U.S.
Begin­ning in July 1976, powerful new Soviet »over-the-hori­zon radars« (the in- famous Woodpe­ckers) beca­me ope­ra­tio­nal. Exten­si­ve wea­ther engi­nee­ring over the U.S. has been accom­plished by the­se wea­pon sys­tems. (This has been sepa­ra­te­ly docu­men­ted by the pre­sent aut­hor; C. B. Bak­er, edi­tor of Youth Action News; Andrew Michrow­ski of Canada’s Pla­ne­ta­ry Asso­cia­ti­on for Clean Ener­gy (PACE); and other rese­ar­chers such as Andri­ja Puha­rich.) In addi­ti­on, the Woodpe­ckers pos­sess the full ran­ge of TR wave wea­pon capa­bi­li­ties, inclu­ding real-time holo­gra­phy capa­bi­li­ties and anti-Ste­alth capa­bi­li­ties. Ter­ri­ble anti-bio­lo­gi­cal capa­bi­li­ties are also pos­s­es­sed by the­se wea­pon sys­tems, and they are also high­ly effec­ti­ve as glo­bal launch pha­se and mid­cour­se pha­se defen­si­ve wea­pons for use against U.S. mis­siles and bombers.
In 1985, the Soviets com­ple­ted »wet run« wea­pon tests against U.S. mis­siles and air­craft and at least three of NASA’s shut­tle laun­ches, employ­ing the Woodpe­ckers in the launch pha­se ABM anti-bom­ber mode.
Begin­ning in Decem­ber 1985, actu­al des­truc­tion of sel­ec­ted U.S. mis­siles and air­craft was accom­plished. Tar­gets des­troy­ed by the Soviets included the Arrow DC‑8 at Gan­der AFB, New­found­land on Dec.12, 1985; the shut­tle Chal­len­ger laun­ched on Jan. 28, 1986; the Titan 34‑D rocket laun­ched on Apr.18, 1986; a U.S. Del­ta rocket laun­ched on May 3, 1986; and the French Aria­ne rocket laun­ched in late May, 1986.
In 1986 and 1987, the mys­te­rious loss of two high­ly clas­si­fied U.S. air­craft — belie­ved to be Ste­alth figh­ters — may also have been due to Soviet test­ing of TR wea­pon capa­bi­li­ties and anti-Ste­alth capa­bi­li­ties of the Soviet Woodpe­cker wea­pon systems.
Howe­ver, a seve­re limi­ta­ti­on on the unrest­ric­ted use of TR wea­pons exists. If powerful­ly and unres­trai­ned­ly used, they will cau­se nuclear war­heads and nuclear mate­ri­al to explo­de as sur­face nuclear bursts — in the dir­tie­st pos­si­ble fashion. The resul­ting mas­si­ve radio­ac­ti­ve fall­out would pro­ba­b­ly wipe out all hig­her forms of life on earth. Note that Khrush­chev sta­ted in 1960 that the­se fan­ta­stic wea­pons could »wipe out all life on earth if unres­trai­ned­ly used.«
As long as we pos­sess an app­re­cia­ble deploy­ment and stock­pi­le of nuclear wea­pons, we are essen­ti­al­ly »dead man fuzed« against sub­stan­ti­al Soviet usa­ge of their powerful TR wave weapons.
Thus Gor­ba­chev needs to »thin out« the deploy­ed and stored Wes­tern nuclear war­heads, to allow a more unres­trai­ned field of play for his decisi­ve TR wave wea­pons. That is why at Reykja­vik he sud­den­ly expres­sed full inte­rest in Pre­si­dent Reagan’s zero opti­on, even expres­sing agree­ment with the prin­ci­ple of on-site inspec­tion to insu­re dis­mant­ling of mis­siles and rem­oval of warheads.
That is also why the Rus­si­ans are so actively inte­res­ted in nego­tia­ting the with­dra­wal of nuclear wea­pons from Euro­pe. They can quick­ly and easi­ly take Euro­pe, the moment the nuclear wea­pons are thin­ned out and our »dead man fuzing« is removed!
To app­re­cia­te the ease with which a Soviet offen­si­ve, aug­men­ted with unres­trai­ned TR wave wea­pons, can take Euro­pe, con­sider this: A sin­gle air­bor­ne Soviet stand­off radar jam­mer, com­ple­te with adjunct TR, within minu­tes can knock out all U.S. Bri­tish, and FRO radars that illu­mi­na­te it. Each pul­se it fires, des­troys an Allied radar. A sin­gle Soviet stand­off com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons jam­mer, com­ple­te with adjunct TR, within minu­tes can knock out all U.S. Bri­tish, and FRG com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons cen­ters that are trans­mit­ting within its detec­tion ran­ge. Each pul­se that it fires des­troys an Allied com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons cen­ter. A sin­gle stand­off Soviet jam­mer-based TR wave wea­pon can des­troy an Allied car­ri­er task force. Pul­se after pul­se from that wea­pon sys­tem will des­troy the task force’s radars and com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons, explo­de HE pro­pel­lants and nuclear wea­pons, explo­de fuel, igni­te flamma­ble mate­ri­als, explo­de rockets and ammu­ni­ti­on, and kill per­son­nel who­le­sa­le. Tac­ti­cal adjunct TR wea­pons can rapidly des­troy air­craft, mis­siles, radars, radi­os, per­son­nel, tanks, wea­pon car­ri­ers, per­son­nel car­ri­ers, ammu­ni­ti­on dumps, gaso­li­ne dumps, etc. The instant vul­nerabi­li­ty of any mas­si­ve emit­ter such as AWACS is rea­di­ly seen.
We are refer­ring to a new kind of blitz­krieg war: War con­duc­ted by powerful beams and des­truc­tion, engen­de­red at the speed of light War in which elec­tro­ma­gne­tic radia­tors are the pri­ma­ry decisi­ve wea­pons. War in which new kinds of direc­ted ener­gy wea­pons play the major role. War which ren­ders all our pre­sent defen­si­ve arma­da of wea­pons archaic and use­l­ess. War in which the mate­ri­el and per­son­nel loss rates are so incre­di­bly high that they bogg­le the mind of the more con­ven­tio­nal mili­ta­ry tac­ti­ci­an and plan­ner. War in which even a small nati­on with TR wave wea­pons can strike and devas­ta­te a major power, and pos­sess a first-strike capa­bi­li­ty unpar­al­le­led in human histo­ry. War which could be trig­ge­red by radi­cal splin­ter groups and ter­ro­rists groups that acqui­re the tech­no­lo­gy. War in which the sligh­test mis­cal­cu­la­ti­on or the misu­se of the wea­pon­ry can com­ple­te­ly des­troy the earth. War which places extre­me empha­sis on fin­ding »other ways« — such as sur­rep­ti­tious bio­lo­gi­cal strikes and insi­dious elec­t­ro-psy­cho­lo­gi­cal attack and con­trol — to deci­ma­te a foe. War that Wes­tern govern­ments, popu­laces, and Armed Forces are com­ple­te­ly unpre­pared — mili­ta­ri­ly and psy­cho­lo­gi­cal­ly — to face.
NATO can be defea­ted in two hours or less, and the enti­re war — mop up and all — would last per­haps three days.
Of cour­se, powerful demons­tra­ti­ons of Soviet stra­te­gic super­wea­pons could be pro­vi­ded, to show that attempt­ed nuclear reta­lia­ti­on would sim­ply be sui­ci­de. The Woodpe­cker wea­pon sys­tems alo­ne could wipe out all major com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons sys­tems and power sys­tems in the U.S. indu­ce waves of EM-indu­ced death and dise­a­se in pre­an­noun­ced loca­ti­ons, indu­ce waves of abject fear and panic in the popu­lace, or psy­cho­lo­gi­cal­ly dis­rupt and disable — say — the enti­re Washing­ton D.C. area, to include the peo­p­le, the govern­ment, and the Pentagon.
If such a sce­na­rio were accom­pa­nied by a pro­cla­ma­ti­on of a Soviet equi­va­lent to the »Mon­roe Doc­tri­ne« — except app­ly­ing it in Euro­pe, an offer of a ceas­e­fi­re, and an offer to allow us a »Dun­kirk« to evacua­te the bea­ten rem­nants of our Euro­pean forces, we would almost cer­tain­ly be forced to accept the Soviet terms for a ceas­e­fi­re that left the U.S. intact.
The U.S. Con­gress — reac­ting with alacri­ty to accept this sud­den and appar­ent­ly mira­cu­lous Soviet leni­en­cy, and avo­id the des­truc­tion of the world — would pro­ba­b­ly play the lea­ding role in dic­ta­ting our accep­tance of libe­ral Soviet terms.
An agree­ment with the Soviets to mutual­ly with­draw many of the nuclear mis­siles from Euro­pe appears to be immi­nent. When the mis­siles are thin­ned out, the pre­ce­ding sce­na­rio or some vari­ant of it is almost cer­tain to occur.
The­re remains, howe­ver, one fly in the Soviet oint­ment: The U.S. Stra­te­gic Defen­se Initiative.
Pre­sent­ly our sci­en­tists app­ly pha­se con­ju­ga­ti­on pri­ma­ri­ly to »keep laser ener­gy beams int­act for grea­ter distances.« They appear to be com­ple­te­ly una­wa­re of the elec­tro­gra­vi­ta­tio­nal aspects of pha­se conjugation.
A col­le­ague of the aut­hor has alre­a­dy rigo­rous­ly pro­ven this elec­tro­gra­vi­ta­tio­nal aspect on the labo­ra­to­ry bench. The pha­se con­ju­ga­te (time rever­sed) wave is com­po­sed of, and car­ri­es, nega­ti­ve ener­gy and nega­ti­ve time. If an object is forced to pro­du­ce a gre­at deal of this nega­ti­ve energy/negative time, it pro­du­ces anti­gra­vi­ty. This is becau­se, in nega­ti­ve time, gra­vi­ty is a repul­si­on, not an attraction.
In addi­ti­on, if the elec­tro­ma­gne­tic ener­gy of a laser is chan­ged into gra­vi­ta­tio­nal ener­gy, a theo­re­ti­cal gain of up to 1036 (pro­tons) to l042 (elec­trons) is achie­va­ble. In prac­ti­cal devices, an ener­gy gain of 1020 may rea­di­ly be achie­ved. Appli­ed to a modi­fied powerful laser in space, this elec­tro­gra­vi­ta­tio­nal gain fac­tor is of over­whel­ming significance.
In SDI, U.S. sci­en­tists pre­sent­ly envi­si­on a high ener­gy laser in orbit, pum­ped per­haps by means of a nuclear explo­si­on. The pul­sed beam from this laser would have suf­fi­ci­ent power to des­troy a rising Soviet stra­te­gic ICBM in the launch pha­se, say at 10,000 miles away.
If that same laser were con­ver­ted to a sca­lar elec­tro­ma­gne­tics laser (one that turns much of its elec­tro­ma­gne­tic ener­gy into gra­vi­ta­tio­nal ener­gy), it could blast and des­troy pos­si­bly a quar­ter of Rus­sia with a sin­gle shot.
Thus if we deve­lo­ped and tes­ted the SDI spatial/launch hard­ware for the space-based high ener­gy laser, so that the­se sys­tems were available for imme­dia­te laun­ching, we could con­vert their lasers to sca­lar EM and still pos­sess a very real stra­te­gic reta­lia­ti­on capa­bi­li­ty, even if the Soviets should strike us almost unres­trai­ned­ly with powerful TR wave wea­pons. If we laun­ched seve­ral of the­se sys­tems, we could still pro­ba­b­ly get off a few shots at Rus­sia and des­troy her, befo­re all our space lasers could be des­troy­ed by Soviet coun­ter weapons.
In that case, mutu­al assu­red des­truc­tion would still exist, and we would still pos­sess a full »last ditch« stra­te­gic reta­lia­ti­on capability.
Gen­na­di Gera­si­mov, Soviet For­eign Minis­ter spo­kes­man, con­firm­ed as much on the Peter Jen­nings’ ABC News Show, Los Ange­les, Cali­for­nia on 13 Octo­ber, 1986. The real con­cern (with SDI), he indi­ca­ted, is not with its pre­sent design. Ins­tead, the Soviet con­cern is that the U.S. would make a gre­at tech­ni­cal breakth­rough and deploy new devices in space as a modi­fi­ca­ti­on to SDI, pre­sen­ting an unac­cep­ta­ble thre­at to the Soviet Union.
Gera­si­mov was almost cer­tain­ly refer­ring to the poten­ti­al for U.S. adapt­a­ti­on of the SDI space-based lasers to elec­tro­gra­vi­ta­tio­nal lasers capa­ble of des­troy­ing the Soviet Union.
Obvious­ly, if the high ener­gy laser wea­pons stay groun­ded in the labo­ra­to­ries, and the sys­tem hard­ware is not deve­lo­ped and rea­dy, that stra­te­gic reta­lia­ti­on capa­bi­li­ty is lost to us. For that reason, Gor­ba­chev is ada­mant­ly insis­ting that the SDI defen­se must not be deve­lo­ped and tes­ted in space.
If Gor­ba­chev can pre­vent the deve­lo­p­ment and test­ing of the SDI space-based high ener­gy laser and get the nuclear wea­pons thin­ned out, he imme­dia­te­ly holds the decisi­ve win­ning hand.
This is whe­re we are now, vis a vis the Soviets. This is the back­ground neces­sa­ry to under­stand the full con­text of the pre­sent jous­ting bet­ween the Soviet Uni­on and the U.S.
In the Washing­ton Times of Aug. 26, 1986, Soviet Chief of Staff Ser­gei Akhro­meyev war­ned the United Sta­tes that the Soviet Uni­on could have an unp­lea­sant sur­pri­se respon­se if the U.S. deploys its Stra­te­gic Defen­se Initia­ti­ve (SDI) in space. Akhro­meyev stated:
»If the United Sta­tes deploys a shield in space, the Soviet Uni­on will have seve­ral opti­ons, none of what Washing­ton would wish… The Soviet Uni­on will very quick­ly find a respon­se of which the United Sta­tes has no inkling as yet «
It is abso­lut­e­ly essen­ti­al that the Pre­si­dent of the United Sta­tes, the Secre­ta­ry of Defen­se, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the U.S. Con­gress be awa­re of the­se Soviet wea­pons and their capabilities.
It is also essen­ti­al that the U.S. public beco­me awa­re of the real natu­re of the hid­den Soviet thre­at that faces us, so that public sup­port will be forth­co­ming for the hard decis­i­ons our govern­ment lea­ders have to make to coun­ter it.