Chemtrails-Kriminelle Experimente: Chemtrails of the World

by Mark Metcalf
Chemtrails

The fol­lo­wing excerp­ts are from the new wall calendar/picture book, Chem­trails of the World, by Mark Metcalf.

Initi­al­ly, the chem­trail pro­gram mani­fes­ted in a varie­ty of ways. In some iso­la­ted cases, obser­vers repor­ted see­ing cle­ar­ly mark­ed US mili­ta­ry jet figh­ters fly­ing at tree-top height drop­ping a spray that kil­led ani­mals and sicke­ned peo­p­le. Some cases occur­red in parts of Washing­ton sta­te near the Cana­di­an bor­der. But the over­whel­ming majo­ri­ty of sightin­gs con­sis­ted of rows of clouds being emit­ted from white jets fly­ing at high alti­tu­de. Whe­re do the­se white jets come from and who is direc­ting the chem­trail spray­ing pro­gram? It turns out that the United Sta­tes Air Force has a fleet of appro­xi­m­ate­ly 550 KC-135 tan­ker jets many of which have been pain­ted white to resem­ble civi­li­an airliners.2 Air Force docu­ments refer to the long white plu­mes of the­se air­craft as »aeri­al obscu­ra­ti­on,« osten­si­bly becau­se the long trails can spread out over a peri­od of hours to form an over­cast sky.3 The­se arti­fi­ci­al over­casts often have subt­le par­al­lel lines or stria­ti­ons run­ning through them. When loo­king at the sun through the­se thin wis­py clouds one can often obser­ve a subt­le, che­mi­cal, mul­ti-colo­red halo, with colors simi­lar to gaso­li­ne on water. The effect is more pro­no­un­ced when view­ed through pola­ri­zed sun­glas­ses. The jets can also be seen mar­king a lar­ge chem­trail »X« in the sky, indi­ca­ting that satel­li­tes are direc­ting jet flight paths and track­ing the move­ment of the arti­fi­ci­al clouds.

Enter the Black Lines

Chem­trails con­tain many exo­tic mys­te­ries. For exam­p­le, I have noti­ced on num­e­rous occa­si­ons that the KC-135’s appear to be fol­lo­wing a faint black line in the sky. At first I thought it was an opti­cal illu­si­on, but I later rea­li­zed it must be real. In scan­ning the Inter­net I found that many others were also see­ing the lines coin­ci­de with chem­trail spraying.4 One man from Swe­den wro­te, »On the day that this pic­tu­re was taken (of the chem­trails), I found a stran­ge dark shadow in front of the pla­ne. First I thought that this was some kind of opti­cal illu­si­on. The air­craft fol­lo­wed the dark shadow-line in a per­fect way, when it all of a sud­den made a turn and moved away from it. I rea­li­zed that this was some kind of line that the pla­ne fol­lo­wed and not at all an illu­si­on crea­ted by the pla­ne.« In ano­ther case, a woman dri­ving from Des Moi­nes to Shen­an­do­ah, Iowa, said, »I saw a black line extend out from a pla­ne I was wat­ching. The sub­se­quent chem­trail fol­lo­wed the black line exactly.«

The most inte­res­t­ing report came from someone in the air. »I was fly­ing to San Fran­cis­co from Lon­don Heath­row and we were over Green­land at the time when I loo­ked out of the win­dow and noti­ced a thick trans­lu­cent black band in the sky. I stared at it for a while unable to work out what I was loo­king at. It was pro­ba­b­ly about a mile away from the pla­ne and stret­ched as far as you could see in a per­fect­ly straight line in both direc­tions. Sud­den­ly a black object appeared in the midd­le of the (black line) cor­ri­dor and stop­ped, tur­ned slight­ly towards the pla­ne and then did the stran­gest thing: it elon­ga­ted to about 10 times the ori­gi­nal size until it was what I can only descri­be as a stret­ched-out tri­an­g­leŠ then instant­ly acce­le­ra­ted away at a phe­no­me­nal speed down the (black line) corridor.

»My two col­le­agues also wit­nessed this and were just as puz­zled and ama­zed. Short­ly after, just into Cana­da we noti­ced a very, very long per­fect­ly straight road through lite­ral­ly nowhe­re just going on for miles. Sud­den­ly we pas­sed a huge pen­ta­gon-shaped com­plex that this road led to with not­hing else around. Just this place with buil­dings and han­gars and a run­way abso­lut­e­ly in the midd­le of nowhere.«

One Coun­try Tri­es to Stop the Spraying

Befo­re the publi­ca­ti­on of this book, chem­trail spray­ing had been repor­ted in a num­ber of other count­ries inclu­ding Eng­land and Spain, both of which are clo­se­ly allied with the US mili­ta­ry. On April 28, 1997, Cuba filed a com­plaint befo­re the United Nati­ons Gene­ral Assem­bly char­ging the U.S. was spray­ing bio­lo­gi­cal war­fa­re agents over Cuban soil.5 While Cuba has been unable to have the mat­ter inves­ti­ga­ted by the UN, the US has also been unable to have the mat­ter dropped.

The offi­ci­al US respon­ses are inte­res­t­ing. In one inci­dent, the Sta­te Depart­ment admit­ted an S2R crop-dus­ting pla­ne ope­ra­ted by the sta­te depart­ment over­flew Cuba, but said it »emit­ted only smo­ke.« Washing­ton Times 8/26/97

In ano­ther inci­dent, »a Cuban pilot repor­ted see­ing the release of unknown sub­s­tances, in the form of a white or grey­ish mist on 10/21/96.« (On 12/18/96, the first signs of thrips pla­gue appeared in Mat­anz­as province.)

The offi­ci­al US respon­se was that the US pilot had, during his flight, seen a Cuban com­mer­cial air­plane fly­ing below, and as he was not cer­tain of having been seen, »fol­lo­wing cau­ti­on and safe­ty pro­ce­du­res,« and with the pur­po­se of secu­ring a posi­ti­ve visu­al cont­act, the pilot used the »smo­ke gene­ra­tor« of his air­craft, in order to »indi­ca­te its loca­ti­on,« adding that »the smo­ke vanis­hed and no flu­id was pou­red from the air­plane.« Howe­ver, the US SAR air­craft, regis­ter N3093M is offi­ci­al­ly used by the Sta­te Depart­ment against drug traf­fi­cking, to des­troy crops. The air­craft uti­li­zes two sprink­ling sys­tems: one for the use of aero­sols and liquid par­tic­les and ano­ther for drop­ping solid par­tic­les. The SAR air­craft is not known to car­ry a smo­ke generator.

The Cuban govern­ment has also filed a pro­test with the UN regar­ding the United Sta­tes’ refu­sal to adopt a draft pro­to­col pro­hi­bi­ting plans and pro­duc­tion of bio­lo­gi­cal wea­pons for 30 years. In addi­ti­on, on May 31, 1999, a lawsu­it for $181 bil­li­on in wrongful death and per­so­nal inju­ry was filed in Hava­na Pro­vin­cial Civil Court in which the US was accu­sed of genocide.

But the bio-attack on Cuba has been unre­len­ting. In 2002, a Cana­di­an tou­rist repor­ted see­ing what he assu­med were regu­lar rocket flights — pos­si­bly to avo­id anti-air­craft fire — that pene­tra­te Cuban airspace and lea­ve long plu­mes of smo­ky white mate­ri­al. Cuban health offi­ci­als were quo­ted as say­ing that the govern­ment is quiet­ly working to con­trol the spread of the bio­lo­gi­cal agents from the US aero­sol campaign.

One Town Stands Up

In 1999, 550 citi­zens of Espa­nola, Onta­rio, brought a peti­ti­on befo­re the Cana­di­an Par­lia­ment asking the Cana­di­an govern­ment to stop the U.S. mili­ta­ry from spray­ing. Town resi­dents said the spray appeared to be making peo­p­le sick. At a public mee­ting on chem­trails, the Onta­rio Minis­ter of Envi­ron­ment refu­sed to release air qua­li­ty fin­dings for Espa­nola. Unli­ke our island neigh­bors to the south, no govern­ment has inter­ce­ded to pro­tect North Ame­ri­cans from the US mili­ta­ry aero­sol campaign.

Some poli­ti­cal lea­ders are no doubt being told that the arti­fi­ci­al cloud spray­ing pro­gram is neces­sa­ry to rever­se glo­bal warm­ing but must be kept secret so as not to panic the public. But if reflec­ting the sun’s light and heat back into space is the pur­po­se, why do the jets also spray at night? Why have they been seen spray­ing on natu­ral­ly occur­ring over­cast days? And why are they inu­n­da­ting the earth with a fun­gus gene­ti­cal­ly tail­o­red to thri­ve on human blood?

Fun­gi from the Crypt

Award-win­ning jour­na­list Will Tho­mas has repor­ted that lab ana­ly­sis show­ed spray samples con­tai­ned over 360 dif­fe­rent varie­ties of mold and fun­gi in addi­ti­on to gene-spli­cing mar­kers and extre­me­ly thin, red human blood cells.6

The chem­trail samples also con­tai­ned a new breed of desi­gner che­mi­cals about which litt­le is known in the public domain but which appear to be very dan­ge­rous, plus alu­mi­num par­ti­cu­la­tes appro­xi­m­ate­ly 1 micron in diameter.

Chem­trail par­tic­les are car­ri­ed by air curr­ents, spre­a­ding a fine dust of patho­ge­nic mate­ri­als throug­hout the envi­ron­ment. The dust is near­ly impos­si­ble to avo­id sin­ce peo­p­le can ingest it sim­ply by breathing, eating and drin­king. It is logi­cal to assu­me that tho­se who have initia­ted this spray­ing pro­gram are well awa­re of its ine­s­ca­pa­ble pro­per­ties. What is more dis­tur­bing is the ease with which a more dead­ly sub­s­tance could be sub­sti­tu­ted for the cur­rent chem­trail mix. Should this hap­pen, it seems likely that the chem­trail pro­gram could exter­mi­na­te all abo­ve-ground human popu­la­ti­ons in North Ame­ri­ca in appro­xi­m­ate­ly one week.

Medi­cal doc­tors often mis­dia­gno­se fun­gal con­di­ti­ons becau­se they are taught that fun­gi can­not live in the blood stream (beco­me sys­te­mic), nor can the reso­lu­ti­on of the micro­sco­pes (1,000 x magni­fi­ca­ti­on) com­mon­ly used by doc­tors reve­al the pre­sence of fun­gi in blood samples. Howe­ver, the­re is a micro­scope (8,000 to 15,000 x magni­fi­ca­ti­on) that can, and does, reve­al fun­gus in the blood. This micro­scope has a came­ra that can record the enlar­ged images on video, pro­vi­ding irre­fu­ta­ble documentation.

The inven­tor of this micro­scope, Dr. Robert Brad­ford of Ame­ri­can Bio­lo­gics, was actual­ly run out of the United Sta­tes for his efforts to help man­kind and now has an office in Tijua­na, Mexi­co. Doc­tors pos­ses­sing the­se super-micro­sco­pes are inten­se­ly »regu­la­ted« by the fede­ral govern­ment, which clo­se­ly moni­tors their rese­arch. Under the Food and Drug Admi­nis­tra­ti­on (FDA) rules, pati­ents can­not be shown images or test results from the micro­scope. Rese­arch is also sub­ject to inspec­tion at any time of the day or night, and the FDA char­ges the tar­ge­ted rese­ar­chers $250 each time they show up.

Desi­gner Fun­gus and Cancer

Dr. Mari­jah McCain, foun­der of the Her­bal Hea­ler Aca­de­my in Moun­tain View, Arkan­sas, has con­duc­ted exten­si­ve stu­dies with her $40,000 super-micro­scope. In one stu­dy she dis­co­ver­ed and docu­men­ted a con­ta­gious leuk­emia virus. In ano­ther stu­dy, test­ing thir­ty pati­ents, Dr. McCain found that eigh­ty-three per­cent had sys­te­mic fun­gus in the blood. Her rese­arch also shows a direct link bet­ween the pre­sence of fun­gus in the blood and the spread of cancer.7 Dr. McCain said, »Every sin­gle pati­ent that I have seen that is ter­mi­nal with can­cer has the most incre­di­ble fun­gus over­growth in the blood stream. Can­cer is a slow-moving growth of muta­ting cells. The (all­o­pa­thic) doc­tors will tell you it’s fast moving and it’s going to kill you very quick­ly. What can kill you is the fun­gus becau­se the fun­gus moves very quick­ly and it’s cau­sed direct­ly by the use of the che­mo­the­ra­py. I have docu­men­ted this in every instance.«

What Dr. McCain is say­ing is that fungus/yeast is a plant and the growth of plants is acce­le­ra­ted by some che­mi­cals and by radia­ti­on. She has also dis­co­ver­ed that many cases of arthri­tis are not arthri­tis, but sys­te­mic fungus/yeast in the blood that clogs the arte­ries, caus­ing them to swell.

Dr. McCain has been relent­less­ly houn­ded by the FDA. The­re is evi­dence that FDA acti­vi­ties are covert­ly direc­ted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) using exe­cu­ti­ves from top-secret con­trac­tors like Mons­an­to Cor­po­ra­ti­on who are appoin­ted to high FDA poli­cy-making posi­ti­ons despi­te obvious con­flict of interest.8 Dr. McCain has also had num­e­rous attempts on her life. In one case, a high-powered rif­le fired through the walls of her home. In ano­ther case, an unmark­ed heli­c­op­ter spray­ed her with poi­son. (In 1997, an unmark­ed, white heli­c­op­ter spray­ed me with an unknown sub­s­tance while hove­ring about six­ty feet abo­ve my home in Los Ange­les for appro­xi­m­ate­ly five minutes.).

Micro­bio­lo­gist Mor­ta­li­ty Goes Up

Inte­res­t­ingly, the­re now appears to be a glo­bal ass­as­si­na­ti­on pro­gram of the world’s top micro­bio­lo­gists. Sin­ce 9−11−01, fif­teen lea­ding micro­bio­lo­gists have met untime­ly ends due to ever­y­thing from gunshots to base­ball bats to fal­ling off bridges. Many of the­se men were con­side­red the world’s lea­ding experts in infec­tious dise­a­se. See http://www.copvcia.com for more details.

Bari­um Found in Chemtrails

A Mr. Clif­ford Car­ni­com has cul­tu­red chem­trail spray samples in New Mexi­co and pro­ven that bari­um is present.10 His test pro­ce­du­res and results are pos­ted at http://www.carnicom.com. Bari­um sup­pres­ses human T‑cell pro­duc­tion, making the human body very sus­cep­ti­ble to infec­tious agents. Bari­um also has elec­tro­ma­gne­tic pro­per­ties and may be both ampli­fy­ing and more even­ly disper­sing pul­sed-ener­gy waves first unco­ver­ed by a decea­sed Uni­ver­si­ty of Cha­pel Hill pro­fes­sor, Dr. David Fraser, in 1975. The­se waves are now most likely blan­k­eting all cities and towns in North Ame­ri­ca for the pur­po­se of mood and mind control.

Car­ni­com has also con­firm­ed the exis­tence of the pul­sed ener­gy in every loca­ti­on he has tes­ted and has crea­ted a method by which it can be mea­su­red and recor­ded that is pos­ted on his web­site, http://www.carnicom.com

Pul­sed-ener­gy mind-con­trol tech­no­lo­gy for mass popu­la­ti­ons was first tes­ted on Med­ford, Ore­gon, making it the sui­ci­de capi­tal of the nati­on over­night in the mid-seven­ties. See my artic­le, »The Secret War Against Med­ford, Oregon.«

The Spider’s Web

Car­ni­com also recei­ved two simi­lar spray samples picked up by sepa­ra­te eye­wit­nesses wan­ting to know what the stran­ge web­li­ke mate­ri­al was. One of the samples was fif­ty feet long by a half-inch wide. A small por­ti­on was sent to a labo­ra­to­ry for detail­ed ana­ly­sis, whereu­pon two PhD’s stead­fast­ly main­tai­ned that the mate­ri­al was eit­her silk or wool fibers. Howe­ver, the­se men abrupt­ly bro­ke off all com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on once their con­clu­si­on was chal­len­ged by simp­le, ordi­na­ry facts.

Human hair ran­ges from 60 to 100 microns thick. Wool fibers are 15 to 25 microns thick. Asbes­tos fibers are 2 to 3 microns thick. But the extre­me­ly adhe­si­ve, web­li­ke fibers were essen­ti­al­ly invi­si­ble to the human eye, mea­su­ring 0.2 to 0.3 microns in dia­me­ter. Under micro­sco­pic ana­ly­sis they appeared wavy and of a syn­the­tic natu­re. »Suf­fi­ci­ent­ly uni­que to war­rant fur­ther inves­ti­ga­ti­on,« said Carnicom.

EPA Says »Drop Dead.«

A sam­ple was then sent to Carol M. Brow­ner at the Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agen­cy (EPA) by cer­ti­fied mail.3 The EPA has sin­ce refu­sed to ack­now­ledge pos­ses­si­on of the sam­ple and has issued a state­ment say­ing they are »una­wa­re« of any pro­gram to dis­tri­bu­te mate­ri­als over the popu­la­ti­on of the United Sta­tes through the use of aircraft.

Doc­tors Beco­me Alarmed

Eight doc­tors have come tog­e­ther to start the Mor­gel­lons Rese­arch Foun­da­ti­on, a grass­roots orga­niza­ti­on, dedi­ca­ted to fin­ding the cau­se of an incre­asing­ly pre­va­lent skin dise­a­se of unknown ori­gin. Their web­site, http://www.morgellons.org , is a tre­asu­re-tro­ve of medi­cal docu­men­ta­ti­on that includes pho­to­graphs of the micro­fi­bers. The dise­a­se con­sists of skin lesi­ons that con­tain »fiber-like objects as well as clear fila­ment-like objects of unknown ori­gin.« »We are attemp­ting to iso­la­te this orga­nism and deter­mi­ne how it is able to cau­se the inten­se itching, sting­ing and dis­fi­gu­ring skin lesi­ons which are the main sym­ptoms of this disease.«

At the moment, the doc­tors say most reports are coming from Cali­for­nia, Texas and Flo­ri­da. »The working hypo­the­sis of this foun­da­ti­on is that an infec­tion with Bor­re­lia burg­dor­fe­ri (Bb) (the bac­te­ria that cau­ses Lyme dise­a­se), may alter the individual’s immu­ne sys­tem and allow this unknown orga­nism to beco­me an oppor­tu­ni­stic co-infection.»11 So far, nine­ty-five per­cent of tho­se aff­lic­ted with this skin dise­a­se who were tes­ted for Bb have tes­ted posi­ti­ve. The fibers have been ana­ly­zed by FTIR (Fou­rier Trans­form Infrared Spec­tro­sco­py) and are com­po­sed of cel­lu­lo­se. A mys­tery fun­gus is also thought to play a role in the disease.

Becau­se the sym­ptoms and phy­si­cal fin­dings are so unu­su­al, most phy­si­ci­ans just assu­me the pati­ent is mis­in­ter­pre­ting their con­di­ti­on. Many adults comp lai­ning of a har­dening or thi­c­ke­ning of the skin, hair loss, lym­phede­ma, skin lesi­ons, pro­found fati­gue and joint pain, are recei­ving a dia­gno­sis of Delu­sio­nal Para­si­to­sis. The Mor­gel­lons doc­tors added that, »Objects descri­bed as gra­nu­les are often found asso­cia­ted with (the) skin lesi­ons as well. Seve­ral peo­p­le have had lymph nodes sur­gi­cal­ly remo­ved due to obs­truc­tion.« You can cont­act the doc­tors at Morgellons@aol.com or fax them at (760) 457‑3441.

The Coming Glo­bal Desert?

If in an envi­ron­ment of 30% humi­di­ty you have what appears to be a cloud forming, it is logi­cal to allow for the pos­si­bi­li­ty of a for­eign mate­ri­al or aero­sol that is gathe­ring what litt­le mois­tu­re is available into that cloud for­ma­ti­on. In this regard, Car­ni­com has deve­lo­ped a hypo­the­sis that cor­re­la­tes well with the known facts. Sin­ce it is impos­si­ble for clouds to form under rela­ti­ve humi­di­ty con­di­ti­ons below 70% wit­hout the intro­duc­tion of an aero­sol of fine par­tic­les, then such par­tic­les must be pre­sent. Logi­cal­ly, the­se par­tic­les should con­tain nuclei with a water-loving natu­re, such as salt. 

Car­ni­com con­cludes that bari­um salts are the ans­wer. When bari­um car­bo­na­te is bur­ned it forms bari­um oxi­de. Among other pro­per­ties it pos­s­es­ses, bari­um oxi­de absorbs mois­tu­re, absorbs CO2 and indu­ces respi­ra­to­ry distress.

It appears that the chem­trail aero­sol is desi­gned to func­tion like a net, cap­tu­ring mois­tu­re in the atmo­sphe­re on a pla­ne­ta­ry level, and then redi­rec­ting that mois­tu­re into space. Says Car­ni­com, »The­re is a case deve­lo­ping that mois­tu­re is actual­ly being drawn out of the sky by this mate­ri­al and that the rain­fall pat­terns are being altered.«

It seems to work like this: Chem­trail clouds draw mois­tu­re and car­bon dioxi­de out of the sur­roun­ding air and the atmo­sphe­re gets dry­er and thin­ner. As long as the chem­trail clouds are still pre­sent, they reflect the sun’s heat back into space, making the reduc­tion of sun-shiel­ding atmo­sphe­re less noti­ceable. But as soon as the spray­ing stops over a given regi­on for a num­ber of days, the land and air beco­me extre­me­ly dry and over­hea­ted. This occur­red over Mon­ta­na, Washing­ton and Bri­tish Colum­bia during the sum­mer of 2003, caus­ing mas­si­ve forest fires. In Bri­tish Colum­bia, the Nel­son Dai­ly News repor­ted the driest con­di­ti­ons in fif­ty years. Anyo­ne pay­ing atten­ti­on to the sky saw hea­vy spray­ing throug­hout the year over the­se fores­ted regi­ons, but by the end of July all spray­ing stopped.

The same series of events may also have been used to trig­ger record tem­pe­ra­tures and forest fires in Euro­pe. »We’­ve not seen such an exten­ded peri­od of dry wea­ther and sun­ny days sin­ce records began (in about 1870),« said Micha­el Kno­bels­dorf, a meteo­ro­lo­gist with the Ger­man wea­ther ser­vice, refer­ring to Euro­pe as a whole.13

This book docu­ments hea­vy spray­ing over Euro­pe with num­e­rous color pho­to­graphs taken during the pre­ce­ding win­ter and spring that led up to the scor­ching sum­mer of 2003.14 In addi­ti­on, a seve­re drought was also expe­ri­en­ced in South Cen­tral India whe­re I had ear­lier pho­to­gra­phed chem­trail spraying.

If the chem­trails are being spray­ed to pro­tect man­kind from a thin­ning atmo­sphe­re and the resul­ting rise in solar heat, why did they stop spray­ing in some are­as during the hot­test months of the sum­mer in 2003? And more important­ly, why did­n’t they resu­me the spray­ing to help con­trol the wide­spread forest fires that began the fol­lo­wing week?

Excerp­ts from the new wall calendar/picture book, Chem­trails of the World,

by

Mark Met­calf.

Pre­fe­ren­ces

R1. Dug­way Pro­ving Grounds, UT

2. Chem­trails: The Video, available from Sil­ver Pro­tects, Inc. Call 503 359‑5954.US

3. Air Force Fact Sheet, March 2003

4. http://www.rense.com , August 20, 2003

5. http://www.afrocubaweb.com/biowar.html , August 20, 2003

6. Radio pro­gram, cir­ca 2000

7. »More than 50% of the popu­la­ti­on will be dia­gno­sed with can­cer during their life­time and the per­cen­ta­ge is ste­adi­ly clim­bing. Today the can­cer rate is 1 out of 2 for men and 2 out of 3 for women.« http://www.drkelley.com , August 20, 2003

8. Mons­an­to Watch at http://www.purefood.org , August-20–2003

9. Ted Gun­der­son docu­men­ta­ry video available from Sil­ver Pro­tects, Inc. Call 503 359‑5954.

10. Clif­ford Car­ni­com is a rese­arch sci­en­tist, and was a fede­ral employee for 15 years with three dif­fe­rent agen­ci­es: the United Sta­tes Depart­ment of Defen­se, the Bureau of Land Manage­ment, and the U.S. Forest Ser­vice. His tech­ni­cal back­ground is exten­si­ve in the fields of geo­de­tic sci­ence, advan­ced mathe­ma­tics, com­pu­ter sci­ence, and the phy­si­cal sciences.

11. »Lyme dise­a­se cases jum­ped 34% in Wis­con­sin last year, a near-record level that out­pa­ced the nati­on­wi­de inci­dence, which increased 24%. Wis­con­sin has the seventh hig­hest inci­dence of the dise­a­se. In 1998, the inci­dence was near­ly 13 per 100,000 resi­dents, which still pales along­side the 70 per 100,000 rate in Con­nec­ti­cut« — Mil­wau­kee Jour­nal Sen­ti­nel, April 13, 1999

12. I asked my att­or­ney, Jona­than Emord — the num­ber one regu­la­to­ry law spe­cia­list in the United Sta­tes — if I might incur any legal pro­blems with my asser­ti­on about the FDA. He respon­ded, »Not atll. We can easi­ly pro­ve that in court.«

13. »What’s remar­kab­le is that the­se extre­mes of wea­ther are hap­pe­ning at such short inter­vals which sug­gests the cli­ma­te is unba­lan­ced. Last year in Ger­ma­ny, we were under water. Now we have one of the worst droughts in human memo­ry,« said Micha­el Knobelsdorf. -

http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/21700/story.htm

14. France’s blis­te­ring heat wave has kil­led some 3,000 peo­p­le in three weeks, health offi­ci­als said on Thurs­day, describ­ing the death rate as an epidemic.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A57900-2003Aug14.html

http://www.silverprotects.com/media/chemtrails.html

Infor­mant: Geor­ge Paxinos